Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25040921›Full record

SynthesisHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2015

The impact of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Julie Hallet, Francis S W Zih, Raymond G Deobald, Adena S Scheer, Calvin H L Law, Natalie G Coburn, Paul J Karanicolas

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03212196 (Technical Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula Prevention After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in High-risk Pancreatic Remnant), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03212196 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Technical Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula Prevention After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in High-risk Pancreatic Remnant: a Risk-adjusted Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled72ConditionsPancreatic FistulaArmsPancreaticogastrostomy with external drain, Pancreaticojejunostomy with transanastomotic drain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Systematic review on the use of matrix-bound sealants in pancreatic resection.HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. A Novel Reconstruction Technique During Pancreaticoduodenectomy After Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass: How I do It.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julie HalletDivision of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Surgical Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Francis S W Zih
Raymond G Deobald
Adena S Scheer
Calvin H L Law
Natalie G Coburn
Paul J Karanicolas

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic fistula (PF) remains a common source of morbidity following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). Despite numerous studies, the optimal method of pancreatic remnant reconstruction is controversial. This study examines the hypothesis that pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is associated with a lower risk for PF after PD compared with pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ).

methodsFive electronic databases and the grey literature were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PJ and PG after PD. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data and assessed methodology. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PF of International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) Grade B or C.

resultsFour RCTs including 676 patients were included. Pancreaticogastrostomy reduced the risk for PF [relative risk (RR) 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.21-0.62] without any difference between high- and low-risk patients. Absolute risk reduction for PF was 4% (95% CI 2.4-5.6) in low-risk patients compared with 10% (95% CI 6.5-14.8) in high-risk patients undergoing PG rather than PJ. The strength of evidence for PF outcome was moderate according to the GRADE classification.

conclusionsReconstruction by PG decreases the rate of PF in comparison with PJ. Surgeons should consider reconstructing the pancreatic remnant following PD with PG, particularly in patients at high risk for PF.

Indexed as

Digestive System Surgical ProceduresBlood Loss, SurgicalGastrostomyHumansLength of StayOperative TimePancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomyPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID25040921
PMCPMC4299385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.