Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25040021›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2014

The impact of prior authorization on buprenorphine dose, relapse rates, and cost for Massachusetts Medicaid beneficiaries with opioid dependence.

Robin E Clark, Jeffrey D Baxter, Bruce A Barton, Gideon Aweh, Elizabeth O'Connell, William H Fisher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robin E ClarkCenter for Health Policy and Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA.
Jeffrey D Baxter
Bruce A Barton
Gideon Aweh
Elizabeth O'Connell
William H Fisher
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Massachusetts Lowell · US

Funding

Cost, Benefit & Regulation of Buprenorphine Treatment for Medicaid BeneficiariesR01DA029741 · NIDA · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI CLARK, ROBIN E. · 2010 to 2012
$1.2M
NIDA NIH HHS 5R01DA029741NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA029741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the impact of a 2008 dose-based prior authorization policy for Massachusetts Medicaid beneficiaries using buprenorphine + naloxone for opioid addiction treatment. Doses higher than 16 mg required progressively more frequent authorizations. DATA SOURCES: Mediciaid claims for 2007 and 2008 linked with Department of Public Health (DPH) service records. STUDY

designWe conducted time series for all buprenorphine users and a longitudinal cohort analysis of 2,049 individuals who began buprenorphine treatment in 2007. Outcome measures included use of relapse-related services, health care expenditures per person, and buprenorphine expenditures. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsWe used ICD-9 codes and National Drug Codes to identify individuals with opioid dependence who filled prescriptions for buprenorphine. Medicaid and DPH data were linked with individual identifiers. PRINCIPAL

findingsIndividuals using doses >24 mg decreased from 16.5 to 4.1 percent. Relapses increased temporarily for some users but returned to previous levels within 3 months. Buprenorphine expenditures decreased but total expenditures did not change significantly.

conclusionPrior authorization policies strategically targeted by dose level appear to successfully reduce use of higher than recommended buprenorphine doses. Savings from these policies are modest and may be accompanied by brief increases in relapse rates. Lower doses may decrease diversion of buprenorphine.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlHealth ExpendituresAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineCohort StudiesCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsMedicaidOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersRecurrenceUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphinebuprenorphineDrug addiction treatmentMedicaidpharmaceutical policyprior authorization

Identifiers

PMID25040021
PMCPMC4237648
OpenAlexW2019565950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.