Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2014
Randomized controlled trial comparing Moviprep® and Phosphoral® as bowel cleansing agents in patients undergoing colonoscopy.
Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Randomized Controlled Trial of Polyethylene Glycol versus Oral Sodium Phosphate for Bowel Preparation in Unsedated Colonoscopy.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Randomised clinical study comparing the effectiveness and physiological effects of hypertonic and isotonic polyethylene glycol solutions for bowel cleansing.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Colonoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Current Aspects.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntroducing colonoscopy as part of colorectal cancer screening on a national level, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy of the two most common bowel cleansing agents, Moviprep(®) and Phosphoral(®). Secondly, we evaluated the benefit for the patient and society in terms of sick leave and discomfort.
methodsIn a single-blinded randomized equivalence trial, Phosphoral(®) (NaP) was compared with Moviprep(®) (2 l polyethylene glycol + ascorbic acid) in patients undergoing colonoscopy due to suspicion of cancer. Patients filled out questionnaires concerning stool consistency, discomfort and number of sick days due to bowel cleansing. Blinded colonoscopists estimated the efficiency of the cleansing using the validated Harefield Cleansing Scale.
resultsTwo hundred and sixty-six patients were included 250 of whom underwent full colonoscopy. There was no difference in the percentage of acceptable bowel cleansings in the two groups; however, a significantly higher number of A scores were observed in the Moviprep(®) group (p = 0.028). We found no correlation between stool consistency and outcome of the cleansing and no difference in subjective discomfort during cleansing. Vomiting during cleansing occurred more often in the Phosphoral(®) group (p = 0.002). There was a trend toward a smaller number of sick days in patients who used Moviprep(®) compared with Phosphoral(®).
conclusionsMoviprep(®) and Phosphoral(®) provided equally efficient bowel cleansing in 90 % of patients, but Moviprep(®) provided a higher quality of cleansings graded as successful. The two agents were equally tolerated, and no difference was found in the related number of sick days.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.