Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038889›Full record

ArticleInfection2014

Diagnostic performance of serum high-sensitivity procalcitonin and serum C-reactive protein tests for detecting bacterial infection in febrile neutropenia.

Mizuki Aimoto, Hideo Koh, Takako Katayama, Hiroshi Okamura, Takuro Yoshimura, Shiro Koh, Satoru Nanno, Mitsutaka Nishimoto, Asao Hirose, Mika Nakamae and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Utility of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as predictors of Gram-negative bacteremia in febrile hematological outpatients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  6. Diagnostics for Wound Infections.Advances in wound care · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mizuki AimotoHematology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
Hideo Koh
Takako Katayama
Hiroshi Okamura
Takuro Yoshimura
Shiro Koh
Satoru Nanno
Mitsutaka Nishimoto
Asao Hirose
Mika Nakamae
Takahiko Nakane
Hirohisa Nakamae
Hiroshi Kakeya
Masayuki Hino
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough a few prospective studies have addressed the question as to which biomarker of infection in adult patients with febrile neutropenia (FN) is superior, procalcitonin (PCT) or C-reactive protein (CRP), the results have been inconsistent and inconclusive. This was possibly due to the poor sensitivity of previous PCT tests that have a functional sensitivity of 0.5 ng/ml.

methodsBetween November 2010 and February 2012, we prospectively compared the diagnostic utility of serum high-sensitivity (hs) PCT (lower limit of detection, 0.02 ng/ml) and CRP levels for detecting bacterial infection in patients with FN. Serum was collected within 72 h after the onset of FN in patients with hematological disorders.

resultsSeventy-five febrile episodes were evaluable. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for life-threatening infection defined as septic shock and bacteremia caused by non-coagulase negative staphylococcus were 0.824 (95% CI 0.711-0.937; P = 0.001) for hsPCT and 0.673 (0.505-0.842; P = 0.068) for CRP, respectively. In contrast, CRP, but not hsPCT, tended to increase significantly with the clinical severity, as indicated by the diagnostic classification (P = 0.002 for trend).

conclusionsThe serum hsPCT test may be more useful than the serum CRP test in the detection of life-threatening infection at an early phase after the onset of FN. In contrast, the serum CRP test may be more useful in diagnosing the severity of infection. However, neither of these tests was able to differentiate the cause of FN with a low probability of fatal outcome.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBacteremiaBiomarkersCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProtein PrecursorsROC CurveBiomarkersCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID25038889
OpenAlexW2071594223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.