ArticleBMC bioinformatics2014
Rapid screening for phenotype-genotype associations by linear transformations of genomic evaluations.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 79 citations in OpenAlex.
- Meta-analysis of genome-wide association from genomic prediction models.Animal genetics · 2016Pooled it
- Article
- Incorporating transcriptomic data into genomic prediction models to improve the prediction accuracy of phenotypes of efficiency traits.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Single-Step Genome-Wide Association Study of Factors for Evaluated and Linearly Scored Traits in Swedish Warmblood Horses.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- Practical Considerations When Using Mendelian Sampling Variances for Selection Decisions in Genomic Selection Programs.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- BLUPmrMLM: A Fast mrMLM Algorithm in Genome-wide Association Studies.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Marker effect p-values for single-step GWAS with the algorithm for proven and young in large genotyped populations.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study for Weight Loss at the End of Dry-Curing of Hams Produced from Purebred Heavy Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2024Article
- Genomic Prediction and Genome-Wide Association Study for Boar Taint Compounds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Dimensionality of genomic information and its impact on genome-wide associations and variant selection for genomic prediction: a simulation study.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2023Article
- Genomic selection and genome-wide association studies in tetraploid chipping potatoes.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Single-step genome-wide association study for susceptibility toFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Article
- Host genetic control on rumen microbiota and its impact on dairy traits in sheep.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
- Article
- Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Review
- Microbiability and microbiome-wide association analyses of feed efficiency and performance traits in pigs.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, association studies are analysed using statistical mixed models, with marker effects estimated by a linear transformation of genomic breeding values. The variances of marker effects are needed when performing the tests of association. However, approaches used to estimate the parameters rely on a prior variance or on a constant estimate of the additive variance. Alternatively, we propose a standardized test of association using the variance of each marker effect, which generally differ among each other. Random breeding values from a mixed model including fixed effects and a genomic covariance matrix are linearly transformed to estimate the marker effects.
resultsThe standardized test was neither conservative nor liberal with respect to type I error rate (false-positives), compared to a similar test using Predictor Error Variance, a method that was too conservative. Furthermore, genomic predictions are solved efficiently by the procedure, and the p-values are virtually identical to those calculated from tests for one marker effect at a time. Moreover, the standardized test reduces computing time and memory requirements.The following steps are used to locate genome segments displaying strong association. The marker with the highest - log(p-value) in each chromosome is selected, and the segment is expanded one Mb upstream and one Mb downstream of the marker. A genomic matrix is calculated using the information from those markers only, which is used as the variance-covariance of the segment effects in a model that also includes fixed effects and random genomic breeding values. The likelihood ratio is then calculated to test for the effect in every chromosome against a reduced model with fixed effects and genomic breeding values. In a case study with pigs, a significant segment from chromosome 6 explained 11% of total genetic variance.
conclusionsThe standardized test of marker effects using their own variance helps in detecting specific genomic regions involved in the additive variance, and in reducing false positives. Moreover, genome scanning of candidate segments can be used in meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies, as it enables the detection of specific genome regions that affect an economically relevant trait when using multiple populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.