Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038774›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2014

Association between clinical presentations before myocardial infarction and coronary mortality: a prospective population-based study using linked electronic records.

Emily Herrett, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Adam Timmis, Spiros Denaxas, Harry Hemingway, Liam Smeeth

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01604486 (Natural Ischaemic Preconditioning Before First Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01604486 completednot on this map

Natural Ischaemic Preconditioning Before First Myocardial Infarction: an Analysis of Prospectively Collected UK Electronic Primary Care Records Linked to the National Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2009 to 2013Enrolled16,000ConditionsMyocardial Infarction, Angina Pectoris, Coronary Heart Disease, Peripheral Arterial Disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. UK phenomics platform for developing and validating electronic health record phenotypes: CALIBER.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Enhancing and Extending Biological Performance and Resilience.Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily HerrettFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK emily.herrett@lshtm.ac.uk.
Krishnan BhaskaranFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Adam TimmisBarts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, UK.
Spiros DenaxasUniversity College London, London, UK Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, UK.
Harry HemingwayUniversity College London, London, UK Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, UK.
Liam SmeethFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK Farr Institute of Health Informatics Research, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PDF-2011-04-007Department of Health RP-PG-0407-10314Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Wellcome Trust 086091/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 098504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIschaemia in different arterial territories before acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may influence post-AMI outcomes. No studies have evaluated prospectively collected information on ischaemia and its effect on short- and long-term coronary mortality. The objective of this study was to compare patients with and without prospectively measured ischaemic presentations before AMI in terms of infarct characteristics and coronary mortality. METHODS AND

resultsAs part of the CALIBER programme, we linked data from primary care, hospital admissions, the national acute coronary syndrome registry and cause-specific mortality to identify patients with first AMI (n = 16,439). We analysed time from AMI to coronary mortality (n = 5283 deaths) using Cox regression (median 2.6 years follow-up), comparing patients with and without recent ischaemic presentations. Patients with ischaemic presentations in the 90 days before AMI experienced lower coronary mortality in the first 7 days after AMI compared with those with no prior ischaemic presentations, after adjusting for age, sex, smoking, diabetes, blood pressure and cardiovascular medications [HR: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.57-0.73) P < 0.001], but subsequent mortality was higher [HR: 1.42 (1.13-1.77) P = 0.001]. Patients with ischaemic presentations closer in time to AMI had the lowest seven day mortality (P-trend = 0.001).

conclusionIn the first large prospective study of ischaemic presentations prior to AMI, we have shown that those occurring closest to AMI are associated with lower short-term coronary mortality following AMI, which could represent a natural ischaemic preconditioning effect, observed in a clinical setting. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01604486.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisAtherosclerosisCardiovascular AgentsCerebrovascular DisordersElectronic Health RecordsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIschemiaKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPeripheral Arterial DiseaseCardiovascular AgentsEpidemiologyIschaemiaMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID25038774
PMCPMC4163194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.