Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038624›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research2014

Engaging academia to advance the science and practice of environmental public health tracking.

Heather Strosnider, Ying Zhou, Lina Balluz, Judith Qualters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A messaging standard for environmental inspections: is it time?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heather StrosniderCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, Environmental Health Tracking Branch, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-F60, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Electronic address: HStrosnider@cdc.gov.
Ying ZhouCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, Environmental Health Tracking Branch, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-F60, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Electronic address: YZhou2@cdc.gov.
Lina BalluzCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, Environmental Health Tracking Branch, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-F60, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. Electronic address: LBalluz@cdc.gov.
Judith QualtersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, Office of the Director, 1600 Clifton Road, MS-F60, Atlanta, GA, 30333, USA. Electronic address: JQualters@cdc.gov.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health agencies at the federal, state, and local level are responsible for implementing actions and policies that address health problems related to environmental hazards. These actions and policies can be informed by integrating or linking data on health, exposure, hazards, and population. The mission of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention׳s National Environmental Public Health Tracking Program (Tracking Program) is to provide information from a nationwide network of integrated health, environmental hazard, and exposure data that drives actions to improve the health of communities. The Tracking Program and federal, state, and local partners collect, integrate, analyze, and disseminate data and information to inform environmental public health actions. However, many challenges exist regarding the availability and quality of data, the application of appropriate methods and tools to link data, and the state of the science needed to link and analyze health and environmental data. The Tracking Program has collaborated with academia to address key challenges in these areas. The collaboration has improved our understanding of the uses and limitations of available data and methods, expanded the use of existing data and methods, and increased our knowledge about the connections between health and environment. Valuable working relationships have been forged in this process, and together we have identified opportunities and improvements for future collaborations to further advance the science and practice of environmental public health tracking.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPublic HealthCooperative BehaviorAir pollutionDrinking waterEnvironmental healthEnvironmental public health trackingSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID25038624
PMCPMC4909327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.