Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038534›Full record

ArticleConsciousness and cognition2014

The experience of new sensorimotor contingencies by sensory augmentation.

Kai Kaspar, Sabine König, Jessika Schwandt, Peter König

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Consciousness and cognition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Feel the way with a vibrotactile compass: Does a navigational aid aid navigation?Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kai KasparDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Richard-Strauss-Str. 2, 50931 Cologne, Germany; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Albrechtstr. 28, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany. Electronic address: kkaspar@uni-koeln.de.
Sabine KönigInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Albrechtstr. 28, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
Jessika SchwandtInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Albrechtstr. 28, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany.
Peter KönigInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Albrechtstr. 28, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany; Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embedded in the paradigm of embodied cognition, the theory of sensorimotor contingencies (SMCs) proposes that motor actions and associated sensory stimulations are tied together by lawful relations termed SMCs. We aimed to investigate whether SMCs can be learned by means of sensory augmentation. Therefore we focused on related perceptual changes. Subjects trained for 7 weeks with the feelSpace belt mapping information of the magnetic north to vibrotactile stimulation around the waist. They experienced substantial changes in their space perception. The belt facilitated navigation and stimulated the usage of new navigation strategies. The belt's vibrating signal changed to a kind of spatial information over time while the belt's appeal and perceived usability increased. The belt also induced certain emotional states. Overall, the results show that learning new SMCs with this relatively small and usable device leads to profound perceptual and emotional changes, which are fully compatible with embodied theories of cognition.

Indexed as

AdultClothingFemaleHumansMalePerceptionProprioceptionSpace PerceptionSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTouch PerceptionVibrationYoung AdultContent analysisEmbodied cognitionFeelSpace beltHedonic qualitiesPerceptual changesSensorimotor contingenciesSensory augmentationSubjective experiencesUsability

Identifiers

PMID25038534
PMCPMC4154453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.