Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038533›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2014

Uptake of National AfterSchool Association physical activity standards among US after-school sites.

Jean L Wiecha, Georgia Hall, Michelle Barnes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean L WiechaRTI International, 1400 Main Street, Suite 310, Waltham, MA 02451, USA. Electronic address: jwiecha@rti.org.
Georgia HallWellesley College, 106 Central Street, Wellesley, MA 02481, USA. Electronic address: ghall@wellesley.edu.
Michelle BarnesRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 027709, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn 2011, the National AfterSchool Association (NAA) adopted standards to guide delivery of physical activity (PA). We assessed after school sites' uptake of the five PA standards.

methodWe conducted a descriptive study in fall 2013. NAA emailed 14,000 members requesting that afterschool site directors complete an online questionnaire regarding site characteristics, awareness and use of the standards, and implementation. We calculated implementation scores for each standard by summing points for their component best practices, and examined associations among site characteristics, implementation scores, and awareness and use of the standards.

resultsAmong 595 respondents, 60% were aware of the PA standards and 43% used them for program planning. Awareness and use were significantly higher among NAA members and among sites that were accredited, licensed, or operated by a parent organization. PA content and quality scores were higher among those aware of and using the standards (p<0.01) and correlated with scores for staff training and for program, social, and environmental support (p<0.0001).

conclusionWe observed high recognition and use of the NAA PA standards in a national convenience sample of afterschool programs. Their uptake and use are promising lever for increasing the quality of PA in the afterschool setting.

Indexed as

Health PolicyMotor ActivityCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseGuideline AdherenceGuidelines as TopicHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHumansOrganizations, NonprofitSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesChildMotor activitySchools

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.