Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038414›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience letters2014

Intergeniculate leaflet lesions result in differential activation of brain regions following the presentation of photic stimuli in Nile grass rats.

Andrew J Gall, Lily Yan, Laura Smale, Antonio A Nunez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience letters, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andrew J GallDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. Electronic address: gall@msu.edu.
Lily YanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Laura SmaleDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Antonio A NunezDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Diurnality: Role of the Intergeniculate LeafletF32NS083360 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GALL, ANDREW JASON · 2013 to 2014
$95k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS083360NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS083360-01).
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) plays an important role in the entrainment of circadian rhythms and the mediation of acute behavioral responses to light (i.e., masking). Recently, we reported that IGL lesions in diurnal grass rats result in a reversal in masking responses to light as compared to controls. Here, we used Fos as a marker of neural activation to examine the mechanisms by which the IGL may influence this masking effect of light in grass rats. Specifically, we examined the patterns of Fos activation in retinorecipient areas and in brain regions that receive IGL inputs following 1-h light pulses given during the early night in IGL-lesioned and sham-operated grass rats. Three patterns emerged: (1) IGL lesions had no effect on the Fos response to light, (2) IGL lesions resulted in a reversal in Fos responses to light, and (3) IGL lesions resulted in a lack of a Fos response to light. Of specific interest were the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and the olivary pretectal nucleus (OPT), both of which are retinorecipient and connect reciprocally with the IGL. Light-induced Fos expression in the SCN was unaffected by IGL lesions, whereas the OPT exhibited a significant reduction in Fos expression following a light pulse in animals with IGL lesions. Altogether, our results suggest that the OPT, but not the SCN, exhibits a reversal in Fos responses to light following IGL lesions that reverse masking responses in diurnal grass rats. Our results suggest that interconnections between the IGL and downstream brain areas (e.g., OPT) may play a role in determining the direction of the behavioral response to light.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainCircadian RhythmFemaleGene ExpressionGeniculate BodiesMuridaeOlivary NucleusPhotic StimulationPreoptic AreaProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosSuprachiasmatic NucleusProto-Oncogene Proteins c-fosDiurnalityFosGrass ratIntergeniculate leafletMasking

Identifiers

PMID25038414
PMCPMC4138276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.