Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038145›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology2014

An afferent explanation for sexual dimorphism in the aortic baroreflex of rat.

Grace C Santa Cruz Chavez, Bai-Yan Li, Patricia A Glazebrook, Diana L Kunze, John H Schild

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Key challenges in exploring the rat as a preclinical neurostimulation model for aortic baroreflex modulation in hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Grace C Santa Cruz ChavezStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana;
Bai-Yan LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana;
Patricia A GlazebrookRammelkamp Center for Education and Research, MetroHealth Campus, Cleveland, Ohio; and.
Diana L KunzeRammelkamp Center for Education and Research, MetroHealth Campus, Cleveland, Ohio; and Department of Neurosciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
John H SchildStark Neurosciences Research Institute, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana; jschild@iupui.edu.
MetroHealth · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

Neurobiology of baroreceptor perikarya and afferentationR01HL072012 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI SCHILD, JOHN H · 2003 to 2013
$3.3M
Neuromechanical basis of baroreceptor functionR01HL081819 · NHLBI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SCHILD, JOHN H · 2009 to 2010
$808k
NHLBI NIH HHS HL-072012NHLBI NIH HHS HL-081819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in baroreflex (BRx) function are well documented. Hormones likely contribute to this dimorphism, but many functional aspects remain unresolved. Our lab has been investigating a subset of vagal sensory neurons that constitute nearly 50% of the total population of myelinated aortic baroreceptors (BR) in female rats but less than 2% in male rats. Termed "Ah," this unique phenotype has many of the nonoverlapping electrophysiological properties and chemical sensitivities of both myelinated A-type and unmyelinated C-type BR afferents. In this study, we utilize three distinct experimental protocols to determine if Ah-type barosensory afferents underlie, at least in part, the sex-related differences in BRx function. Electron microscopy of the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) revealed that female rats have less myelin (P < 0.03) and a smaller fiber cross-sectional area (P < 0.05) per BR fiber than male rats. Electrical stimulation of the ADN evoked compound action potentials and nerve conduction profiles that were markedly different (P < 0.01, n = 7 females and n = 9 males). Selective activation of ADN myelinated fibers evoked a BRx-mediated depressor response that was 3-7 times greater in female (n = 16) than in male (n = 17) rats. Interestingly, the most striking hemodynamic difference was functionally dependent upon the rate of myelinated barosensory fiber activation. Only 5-10 Hz of stimulation evoked a rapid, 20- to 30-mmHg reduction in arterial pressure of female rats, whereas rates of 50 Hz or higher were required to elicit a comparable depressor response from male rats. Collectively, our experimental results are suggestive of an alternative myelinated baroreceptor afferent pathway in females that may account for, at least in part, the noted sex-related differences in autonomic control of cardiovascular function.

Indexed as

BaroreflexHemodynamicsAction PotentialsAfferent PathwaysAnimalsAortaElectric StimulationFemaleMaleMechanotransduction, CellularNerve Fibers, MyelinatedNeural ConductionParasympathetic Nervous SystemPhenotypePressoreceptorsRatsautonomic nervous systembaroreceptorcardiovascularvagalvisceral

Identifiers

PMID25038145
PMCPMC4166749
OpenAlexW1994042162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.