Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038052›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2015

Sox2 gene amplification significantly impacts overall survival in serous epithelial ovarian cancer.

Jimmy Belotte, Nicole M Fletcher, Mitchell Alexis, Robert T Morris, Adnan R Munkarah, Michael P Diamond, Ghassan M Saed

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pluripotency Stemness and Cancer: More Questions than Answers.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How to win the ovarian cancer stem cell battle: destroying the roots.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Cancer biology & medicine · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jimmy BelotteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Nicole M FletcherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Mitchell AlexisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Robert T MorrisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Adnan R MunkarahDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Michael P DiamondDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA, USA.
Ghassan M SaedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA gsaed@med.wayne.edu.
Wayne State University · USAugusta University · USHenry Ford Health System · US

Funding

DETROIT REPRODUCTIVE CAREER DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH CENTERK12HD001254 · NICHD · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HSU, CHAUR-DONG · 1999 to 2019
$4.8M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD001254NICHD NIH HHS K12HD001254
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the deadliest gynecologic cancer. Recently, the existence of ovarian cancer stem cells has been reported. Sox2, Nanog and Oct4 are key markers of "stemness". The objective of this study was to determine whether Sox2, Nanog, and Oct4 are associated with EOC and poor outcome. The expression of these markers was assessed by immunofluorescence staining and real-time RT-PCR in human EOC cell lines MDAH-2774 and SKOV-3, while the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) dataset was analyzed for associations with survival. Sox2, Nanog and Oct4 (POU5F1) were all detected by immunofluorescence staining and these results were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR. The TCGA dataset revealed a 26%, 9%, and 6% amplification of Sox2, Nanog and POU5F1, respectively. Additionally, K-M survival analyses showed a significant median overall survival difference (41 versus 48.3 months, P = .01) for Sox2 amplification, but not for Nanog (44.1 versus 36.2 months, P > .05) and POU5F1 (43.5 versus 45.0 months, P > .05). Our results suggest that Sox2 gene amplification significantly influences overall survival.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCell Line, TumorDatabases, GeneticFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHomeodomain ProteinsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateNanog Homeobox ProteinNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOctamer Transcription Factor-3Ovarian NeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsHomeodomain ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, humanOctamer Transcription Factor-3POU5F1 protein, humanSOX2 protein, humanSOXB1 Transcription Factorsoverall survivalserous epithelial ovarian cancerSox2 amplification

Identifiers

PMID25038052
PMCPMC4275450
OpenAlexW2093680436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.