Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038050›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014

The relationship between sexual selection and sexual conflict.

Hanna Kokko, Michael D Jennions

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interplay of asexual and sexual reproduction in bifunctional insects.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Decoupled evolution of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Decoupled evolution of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  10. Fertility signalling games: should males obey the signal?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Theoretical Reproductive Outcomes of the Sexual Conflict in Humans.Doklady biological sciences : proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Biological sciences sections · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ThePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Spermathecal variation in temperate Opiliones.Integrative and comparative biology · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanna KokkoCenter of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Ecology, Evolution & Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.
Michael D JennionsCenter of Excellence in Biological Interactions, Ecology, Evolution & Genetics, Research School of Biology, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolutionary conflicts of interest arise whenever genetically different individuals interact and their routes to fitness maximization differ. Sexual selection favors traits that increase an individual's competitiveness to acquire mates and fertilizations. Sexual conflict occurs if an individual of sex A's relative fitness would increase if it had a "tool" that could alter what an individual of sex B does (including the parental genes transferred), at a cost to B's fitness. This definition clarifies several issues: Conflict is very common and, although it extends outside traits under sexual selection, sexual selection is a ready source of sexual conflict. Sexual conflict and sexual selection should not be presented as alternative explanations for trait evolution. Conflict is closely linked to the concept of a lag load, which is context-dependent and sex-specific. This makes it possible to ask if one sex can "win." We expect higher population fitness if females win.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionConflict, PsychologicalGenetic FitnessSexual BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleModels, TheoreticalReproductionSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID25038050
PMCPMC4142970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.