Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25038049›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2014

Eukaryotic origins: How and when was the mitochondrion acquired?

Anthony M Poole, Simonetta Gribaldo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Bioenergetics evolution: the link between Earth's and Life's history.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A case for an active eukaryotic marine biosphere during the Proterozoic era.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Eukaryogenesis and oxygen in Earth history.Nature ecology & evolution · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony M PooleSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand Biomolecular Interaction Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand Allan Wilson Centre for Molecular Ecology and Evolution, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand.
Simonetta GribaldoInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie Moléculaire du Gene chez les Extrêmophiles, Département de Microbiologie, Paris 75724, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparative genomics has revealed that the last eukaryotic common ancestor possessed the hallmark cellular architecture of modern eukaryotes. However, the remarkable success of such analyses has created a dilemma. If key eukaryotic features are ancestral to this group, then establishing the relative timing of their origins becomes difficult. In discussions of eukaryote origins, special significance has been placed on the timing of mitochondrial acquisition. In one view, mitochondrial acquisition was the trigger for eukaryogenesis. Others argue that development of phagocytosis was a prerequisite to acquisition. Results from comparative genomics and molecular phylogeny are often invoked to support one or the other scenario. We show here that the associations between specific cell biological models of eukaryogenesis and evolutionary genomic data are not as strong as many suppose. Disentangling these eliminates many of the arguments that polarize current debate.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionModels, BiologicalPhylogenySymbiosisEukaryotaMitochondriaPhagocytosis

Identifiers

PMID25038049
PMCPMC4292153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.