Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25037960›Full record

Trial reportJournal of anesthesia2015

A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of palonosetron in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting over a 72-h period.

Tae Soo Hahm, Jung Won Hwang, Won Ho Kim, Eun Jung Oh, Duk-Kyung Kim, Won Joon Choi, Yun Hong Kim, Jung Hee Ryu, Byung Hoon Yoo, Jun Heum Yon

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of anesthesia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Tae Soo HahmDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung Won Hwang
Won Ho Kim
Eun Jung Oh
Duk-Kyung Kim
Won Joon Choi
Yun Hong Kim
Jung Hee Ryu
Byung Hoon Yoo
Jun Heum Yon
Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital · KRSamsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Bundang Hospital · KRSungkyunkwan University · KRKangbuk Samsung Hospital · KRSamsung (South Korea) · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to assess the efficacy and safety of a single, fixed, intravenous dose of palonosetron (0.075 mg) in the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

methodsThree hundred and eighty-four patients who had at least one risk factors of PONV and underwent surgery under general anesthesia were screened. Those who developed PONV were randomized to receive either 0.075 mg intravenous palonosetron or a placebo. The incidence of nausea and vomiting, severity of nausea, requirements for rescue anti-emetics, and adverse effects at 2, 24, and 72 h after drug administration were evaluated. Complete response (CR) and complete control (CC) rate were compared for 24 and 72 h.

resultsAmong the 384 patients, 152 (39.6 %) developed PONV and were randomized to either the palonosetron (n = 75) or placebo (n = 77) group. The number of patients with CR at 24 and 72 h was higher in the palonosetron group than the placebo group [0-24 h: n = 49 (68.1 %) vs. n = 30 (40.5 %), p < 0.001; 0-72 h: n = 47 (65.3 %) vs. n = 28 (37.8 %), p < 0.001]. The incidence of PONV at 2, 24, and 72 h periods was lower in the palonosetron group than the placebo group (29.2, 45.8, and 50.0 % in the palonosetron group vs. 50.0, 62.2, and 66.2 % in the placebo group, p = 0.010, 0.048, 0.047, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was not different between the groups.

conclusionA single 0.075 mg IV dose of palonosetron effectively increased the CR rates at 24 and 72 h in these moderate-risk patients with established PONV.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdultAnesthesia, GeneralAntiemeticsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIncidenceIsoquinolinesMaleMiddle AgedPalonosetronPostoperative Nausea and VomitingProspective StudiesQuinuclidinesRisk FactorsAntiemeticsIsoquinolinesPalonosetronQuinuclidines

Identifiers

PMID25037960
OpenAlexW2032478675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.