Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25037727›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2015

Adenoma detection at colonoscopy by polypectomy in withdrawal only versus both insertion and withdrawal: a randomized controlled trial.

Madhusudhan R Sanaka, Mansour A Parsi, Carol A Burke, David Barnes, James Church, Maged Rizk, Nizar Zein, Rajesh Joseph, Prashanthi N Thota, Rocio Lopez and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01025960 (Comparison of Detection of Polyps During Both Insertion and Withdrawal Phases of Colonoscopy Versus the Standard Practice of Detection of Polyps During the Withdrawal Phase of Colonoscopy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01025960 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Detection of Polyps During Both Insertion and Withdrawal Phases of Colonoscopy Versus the Standard Practice of Detection of Polyps During the Withdrawal Phase of Colonoscopy: A Prospective Quality Improvement Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2009 to 2012Enrolled768ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsStandard Inspection Colonoscopy, Dual Inspection Colonoscopy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Strategies to Increase Adenoma Detection Rates.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. New technologies and techniques to improve adenoma detection in colonoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2015
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Madhusudhan R SanakaDepartments of Gastroenterology, Desk Q3-1, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44136, USA, sanakam@ccf.org.
Mansour A Parsi
Carol A Burke
David Barnes
James Church
Maged Rizk
Nizar Zein
Rajesh Joseph
Prashanthi N Thota
Rocio Lopez
Ravi P Kiran
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledColonic configuration during insertion phase (IP) and withdrawal phase (WP) is different and some polyps seen during IP are difficult to find during WP and vice versa. To determine if polypectomy performed during both IP and WP of colonoscopy (study arm) increases adenoma detection rate (ADR) compared to WP only (control arm). In this prospective randomized controlled trial, adults undergoing out-patient colonoscopy were enrolled. The primary outcome was mean number of adenomas detected per patient. Secondary outcomes were ADR, defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with at least one adenoma, polyp detection rates (PDR), number of patients classified as high-risk group (presence of ≥3 adenomas of any size, any adenoma ≥1 cm in size, or adenoma with villous component, or high grade dysplasia), procedural times, patients discomfort, and ease of procedure. Among 772 patients enrolled, 610 were included (329 in study arm and 281 in control arm). In both arms, mean number of adenomas detected per patient were similar, 0.78 ± 1.4 vs. 0.74 ± 1.5, P = 0.75. Also, ADR (39.2 vs. 38.1 %, P = 0.77) and PDR (57.1 and 54.1 %, P = 0.45) were similar. Mean insertion time was significantly higher in study arm (10.2 ± 5.8 vs. 9.3 ± 5.6 min, p = 0.046). Proportion of patients identified as high-risk group were significantly higher in study arm (18.8 vs. 11.7 %, P = 0.016).

conclusionsPolypectomy performed during both IP and WP compared to the WP only, did not improve ADR or mean number of adenomas detected per patient.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, #NCT01025960.

Indexed as

AdenomaColectomyColonic PolypsColonoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID25037727
OpenAlexW2004510150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.