Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25037713›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2014

Comparison of statistical, LBP, and multi-resolution analysis features for breast mass classification.

Yasser A Reyad, Mohamed A Berbar, Muhammad Hussain

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasser A ReyadDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, yasaliali@gmail.com.
Mohamed A Berbar
Muhammad Hussain

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Millions of women are suffering from breast cancer, which can be treated effectively if it is detected early. Mammography is broadly recognized as an effective imaging modality for the early detection of breast cancer. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are very helpful for radiologists in detecting and diagnosing abnormalities earlier and faster than traditional screening programs. An important step of a CAD system is feature extraction. This research gives a comprehensive study of the effects of different features to be used in a CAD system for the classification of masses. The features are extracted using local binary pattern (LBP), which is a texture descriptor, statistical measures, and multi-resolution frameworks. Statistical and LBP features are extracted from each region of interest (ROI), taken from mammogram images, after dividing it into N×N blocks. The multi-resolution features are based on discrete wavelet transform (DWT) and contourlet transform (CT). In multi-resolution analysis, ROIs are decomposed into low sub-band and high sub-bands at different resolution levels and the coefficients of the low sub-band at the last level are taken as features. Support vector machines (SVM) is used for classification. The evaluation is performed using Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) database. An accuracy of 98.43 is obtained using statistical or LBP features but when both these types of features are fused, the accuracy is increased to 98.63. The CT features achieved classification accuracy of 98.43 whereas the accuracy resulted from DWT features is 96.93. The statistical analysis and ROC curves show that methods based on LBP, statistical measures and CT performs equally well and they not only outperform DWT based method but also other existing methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector MachineBreast NeoplasmsDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansROC CurveWavelet Analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.