ArticleAmerican journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation2014
Kidney function and population-based outcomes of initiating oral atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate in older adults.
Article in American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of β-blocker agents and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients: an international cohort study.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Article
- Association of Kidney Function With Risk of Adverse Effects of Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Failing to Dose-Reduce Cephalosporin Antibiotics in Older Adults with CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2019Article
- A conceptual framework for evaluating data suitability for observational studies.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Article
- Blood pressure and antihypertensive medication profile in a multiethnic Asian population of stable chronic kidney disease patients.Singapore medical journal · 2016Article
- Cardiovascular-renal axis disorders in the domestic dog and cat: a veterinary consensus statement.The Journal of small animal practice · 2015Article
- Kidney function and the use of nitrofurantoin to treat urinary tract infections in older women.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015Article
- Therapy: atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate--conflicting outcomes data.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAtenolol and metoprolol tartrate are commonly prescribed β-blockers. Atenolol elimination depends on kidney function, whereas metoprolol tartrate does not. We hypothesized that compared to metoprolol tartrate, initiating oral atenolol treatment would be associated with more adverse events in older adults, with the association most pronounced in patients with lower baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs). STUDY
designPopulation-based matched retrospective cohort study. SETTING &
participantsOlder adults (mean age, 75 years) in Ontario, Canada, prescribed oral atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate from April 2002 through December 2011. The 2 groups were well matched (n=75,257 in each group), with no difference in 31 measured baseline characteristics. Patients with end-stage renal disease were ineligible, and 4.6% of patients had chronic kidney disease (median eGFR, 38mL/min/1.73m(2) assessed through a database algorithm). PREDICTORS: β-Blocker type and eGFR. OUTCOMES: A composite outcome of hospitalization with bradycardia or hypotension and all-cause mortality were assessed in 90-day follow-up.
resultsCompared to metoprolol tartrate, initiating atenolol treatment was not associated with higher risk of hospitalization with bradycardia or hypotension (incidence, 0.71% vs 0.79%; relative risk, 0.90; 95%CI, 0.80-1.01). Atenolol treatment initiation was associated with lower 90-day risk of mortality than metoprolol tartrate (incidence, 0.97% vs 1.44%; relative risk, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.61-0.74). Lower eGFR did not modify either association (P for interaction=0.5 and 0.6, respectively). LIMITATIONS: Heart rate and blood pressure were not available in our data sources, and effects ascertained from observational studies are subject to residual confounding.
conclusionsContrary to our expectation, we found that atenolol versus metoprolol tartrate was associated with lower 90-day risk of mortality in patients regardless of eGFR, with no difference in risk of hospitalization with bradycardia or hypotension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.