Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25037525›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2014

Comparison of auditory and visual oddball fMRI in schizophrenia.

Azurii K Collier, Daniel H Wolf, Jeffrey N Valdez, Bruce I Turetsky, Mark A Elliott, Raquel E Gur, Ruben C Gur

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Brain Responses at Encoding Predict Limited Verbal Memory Retrieval by Persons with Schizophrenia.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Azurii K CollierUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: azurii@upenn.edu.
Daniel H WolfUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jeffrey N ValdezUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Bruce I TuretskyUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mark A ElliottUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Raquel E GurUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Ruben C GurUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: gur@upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Theta and Gamma Oscillations in Cortical MicrocircuitsP50MH064045 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GUR, RAQUEL E · 2001 to 2010
$21.6M
NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH064045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with schizophrenia often suffer from attentional deficits, both in focusing on task-relevant targets and in inhibiting responses to distractors. Schizophrenia also has a differential impact on attention depending on modality: auditory or visual. However, it remains unclear how abnormal activation of attentional circuitry differs between auditory and visual modalities, as these two modalities have not been directly compared in the same individuals with schizophrenia. We utilized event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to compare patterns of brain activation during an auditory and visual oddball task in order to identify modality-specific attentional impairment. Healthy controls (n=22) and patients with schizophrenia (n=20) completed auditory and visual oddball tasks in separate sessions. For responses to targets, the auditory modality yielded greater activation than the visual modality (A-V) in auditory cortex, insula, and parietal operculum, but visual activation was greater than auditory (V-A) in visual cortex. For responses to novels, A-V differences were found in auditory cortex, insula, and supramarginal gyrus; and V-A differences in the visual cortex, inferior temporal gyrus, and superior parietal lobule. Group differences in modality-specific activation were found only for novel stimuli; controls showed larger A-V differences than patients in prefrontal cortex and the putamen. Furthermore, for patients, greater severity of negative symptoms was associated with greater divergence of A-V novel activation in the visual cortex. Our results demonstrate that patients have more pronounced activation abnormalities in auditory compared to visual attention, and link modality specific abnormalities to negative symptom severity.

Indexed as

Schizophrenic PsychologyAcoustic StimulationAuditory PerceptionBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophreniaVisual PerceptionAuditory attentionMagnetic resonance imagingOddballVisual attention

Identifiers

PMID25037525
PMCPMC4751027
OpenAlexW2113107006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.