ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014
Text-mining-assisted biocuration workflows in Argo.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open Agile text mining for bioinformatics: the PubAnnotation ecosystem.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Annotation and detection of drug effects in text for pharmacovigilance.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
- ezTag: tagging biomedical concepts via interactive learning.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Accelerating annotation of articles via automated approaches: evaluation of the neXtA5 curation-support tool by neXtProt.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018Article
- Text mining resources for the life sciences.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Review
- EXTRACT: interactive extraction of environment metadata and term suggestion for metagenomic sample annotation.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Overview of the interactive task in BioCreative V.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016Article
- Improving chemical disease relation extraction with rich features and weakly labeled data.Journal of cheminformatics · 2016Article
- SciLite: a platform for displaying text-mined annotations as a means to link research articles with biological data.Wellcome open research · 2016Article
- Europe PMC: a full-text literature database for the life sciences and platform for innovation.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- MetaRNA-Seq: An Interactive Tool to Browse and Annotate Metadata from RNA-Seq Studies.BioMed research international · 2015Article
- Scaling drug indication curation through crowdsourcing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Supporting the annotation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) phenotypes with text mining workflows.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2015Article
- Identification of highly related references about gene-disease association.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biocuration activities have been broadly categorized into the selection of relevant documents, the annotation of biological concepts of interest and identification of interactions between the concepts. Text mining has been shown to have a potential to significantly reduce the effort of biocurators in all the three activities, and various semi-automatic methodologies have been integrated into curation pipelines to support them. We investigate the suitability of Argo, a workbench for building text-mining solutions with the use of a rich graphical user interface, for the process of biocuration. Central to Argo are customizable workflows that users compose by arranging available elementary analytics to form task-specific processing units. A built-in manual annotation editor is the single most used biocuration tool of the workbench, as it allows users to create annotations directly in text, as well as modify or delete annotations created by automatic processing components. Apart from syntactic and semantic analytics, the ever-growing library of components includes several data readers and consumers that support well-established as well as emerging data interchange formats such as XMI, RDF and BioC, which facilitate the interoperability of Argo with other platforms or resources. To validate the suitability of Argo for curation activities, we participated in the BioCreative IV challenge whose purpose was to evaluate Web-based systems addressing user-defined biocuration tasks. Argo proved to have the edge over other systems in terms of flexibility of defining biocuration tasks. As expected, the versatility of the workbench inevitably lengthened the time the curators spent on learning the system before taking on the task, which may have affected the usability of Argo. The participation in the challenge gave us an opportunity to gather valuable feedback and identify areas of improvement, some of which have already been introduced. Database URL: http://argo.nactem.ac.uk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.