Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25037104›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2014

Gene augmentation for adRP mutations in RHO.

Alfred S Lewin, Brian Rossmiller, Haoyu Mao

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. CRISPR/Cas therapeutic strategies for autosomal dominant disorders.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Organoid Technologies for Developing Next-Generation Vision Restoration Therapies of Blindness.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. AAV-DeliveredFrontiers in neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alfred S LewinDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610.
Brian RossmillerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610.
Haoyu MaoDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · US

Funding

Translational Gene Therapy for Rhodopsin Autosomal Dominant Retinitis PigmentosaR24EY022012 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CIDECIYAN, ARTUR V · 2012 to 2016
$7.9M
RESEARCH TRAINING IN VISION SCIENCET32EY007132 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI W CLAY SMITH · 1991 to 2026
$3.8M
Vision Research CoreP30EY021721 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI HAUSWIRTH, WILLIAM W · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NEI NIH HHS 1R24EY022012NEI NIH HHS P30 EY021721NEI NIH HHS P30EY021721NEI NIH HHS R24 EY022012NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutations in the gene for rhodopsin, RHO, cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa, a disease characterized by death of rod photoreceptor cells. At the end stage, when most rods are gone, cones die too, taking central vision with them. One goal of gene therapy, therefore, is to preserve central vision by promoting rod survival in the vicinity of the macula. Dominance in RHO mutations is associated with two phenomena: interference with the function of normal rhodopsin and intrinsic toxicity of the mutant protein. In the case of interference, increased production of the wild-type protein may be therapeutic, but in the case of toxicity, suppression of the mutant protein may also be needed. RHO augmentation has made use of advances in gene delivery to the retina using adeno-associated virus (AAV). Several strategies have been developed for suppression of rhodopsin expression, but because of the heterogeneity of RHO mutations they are not specific for the mutant allele: They suppress both mutant and wild-type RHO. Experiments in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP) mouse models suggest that both RHO augmentation and supplementation plus suppression preserve the survival of rod cells.

Indexed as

MutationAcute-Phase ProteinsAnimalsDNAGenes, DominantGenetic VectorsHumansPhenotypeRetinitis PigmentosaRhodopsinacute-phase protein rhoAcute-Phase ProteinsDNARhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID25037104
PMCPMC4143106
OpenAlexW2167670806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.