ArticleBMC infectious diseases2014
Protecting newborns from pertussis - the challenge of complete cocooning.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategies to increase uptake of maternal pertussis vaccination.Expert review of vaccines · 2021Pooled it
- Randomized clinical trial of the safety and immunogenicity of the Tdap vaccine in pregnant Mexican women.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017Trial
- The Resurgence of Pertussis in Tuscany (Italy): A Six-Year Retrospective Epidemiological Analysis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Preclinical study on an adsorbed acellular diphtheria- tetanus-pertussis (reduced-dose) combined vaccine: evaluation of reproductive safety and immunogenicity.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Resurgence of pertussis: Epidemiological trends, contributing factors, challenges, and recommendations for vaccination and surveillance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Review
- Review
- Public health management of pertussis in adults: Practical challenges and future strategies.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024Review
- Knowledge and Practice of Gynecologists About Tdap and Influenza Vaccination: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2023Article
- The Path to New Pediatric Vaccines against Pertussis.Vaccines · 2021Review
- Vaccinating for Whom? Distinguishing between Self-Protective, Paternalistic, Altruistic and Indirect Vaccination.Public health ethics · 2020Article
- Immunological and Clinical Benefits of Maternal Immunization Against Pertussis: A Systematic Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2019Review
- Influenza and pertussis vaccination during pregnancy - attitudes, practices and barriers in gynaecological practices in Germany.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- Child-parent immunization survey: How well are national immunization recommendations accepted by the target groups?Vaccine: X · 2019Article
- Attributes influencing parental decision-making to receive the Tdap vaccine to reduce the risk of pertussis transmission to their newborn - outcome of a cross-sectional conjoint experiment in Spain and Italy.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2019Article
- [Clinical features and risk factors of pertussis in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2018Article
- Social contact patterns of infants in deciding vaccination strategy: a prospective, cross-sectional, single-centre study.Epidemiology and infection · 2018Article
- Impact of the US Maternal Tetanus, Diphtheria, and Acellular Pertussis Vaccination Program on Preventing Pertussis in Infants <2 Months of Age: A Case-Control Evaluation.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2017Article
- An Assessment of the Cocooning Strategy for Preventing Infant Pertussis-United States, 2011.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Article
- Maternal Immunization Earlier in Pregnancy Maximizes Antibody Transfer and Expected Infant Seropositivity Against Pertussis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016Observational
- Rediscovering Pertussis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increase of pertussis cases, especially in young infants and adolescents, has been noted in various countries. Whooping cough is most serious in neonates and young infants in whom it may cause serious complications such as cyanosis, apnoea, pneumonia, encephalopathy and death. To protect newborns and infants too young to be fully immunized, immunization of close contact persons has been proposed ("cocoon strategy") and implemented in several countries, including Switzerland in 2011. The goal of this study was to assess knowledge about pertussis among parents of newborns and acceptance, practicability and implementation of the recently recommended pertussis cocoon strategy in Switzerland.
methodsWe performed a cross sectional survey among all parents of newborns born between May and September 2012 and 2013 in Basel city and country. Regional statistical offices provided family addresses after approval by the ethical and data protection committees. A standardized questionnaire with detailed instructions was sent to all eligible families. For statistical analyses, independent proportions were compared by Pearson's chi-squared test.
resultsOf 3546 eligible parents, 884 (25%) participated. All three questions exploring pertussis knowledge were answered correctly by 37% of parents; 25% gave two correct answers, 22% gave one correct answer and in the remaining 16% no answer was correct. Pertussis immunization as part of cocooning was recommended to 20% and 37% of mothers and 14% and 32% of fathers in the 2012 and 2013 study cohorts, respectively. Principal advisors for cocooning were pediatricians (66%) followed by gynecologists/obstetricians (12%) and general practitioners (5%). When recommended, 64% of mothers and 59% of fathers accepted pertussis immunization. The majority of vaccinations were administered in the perinatal period and within 2 months of the child's birth. However, cocooning remained incomplete in 93% of families and in most families <50% of close contacts received pertussis vaccination.
conclusionsImplementation of cocooning for protecting newborns from pertussis is challenging and usually remains incomplete. Pertussis immunization rates among close contacts of newborns need to be improved. Ideally, all healthcare providers involved in family planning, pregnancy and child birth should recommend cocooning. Pertussis immunization of pregnant women is an additional measure for optimal protection of newborns and should be promoted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.