ArticleCell2014
Microtubule self-organization via protein-RNA network crosstalk.
Article in Cell, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- APC couples neuronal mRNAs to multiple kinesins, EB1, and shrinking microtubule ends for bidirectional mRNA motility.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microtubule plus-end tracking proteins are crucial for the regulation of microtubule dynamics. Preitner et al. report that one such protein, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), also binds RNA and identify mRNAs encoding tubulin subunits within the brain APC-RNA interactome, suggesting a new mode of microtubule self-regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25036626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.