Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25036472›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of clinical oncology2015

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Evaluating the Role of Radiation Therapy in the Management and Attempts to Identify Low-risk Patients.

Chirag Shah, Frank A Vicini, Sameer Berry, Thomas B Julian, John Ben Wilkinson, Simona F Shaitelman, Atif Khan, Steven E Finkelstein, Neal Goldstein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of clinical oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chirag Shah*Department of Radiation Oncology, Summa Health System, Akron, OH †Michigan Healthcare Professionals/21st Century Oncology, Farmington Hills, MI ‡Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgical Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA §Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis Knighton Health System, Shreveport, LA ∥University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX ¶Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ #21st Century Oncology Translational Research Consortium, Scottsdale, AZ **Clarient Laboratory, Aliso Viejo, CA.
Frank A Vicini
Sameer Berry
Thomas B Julian
John Ben Wilkinson
Simona F Shaitelman
Atif Khan
Steven E Finkelstein
Neal Goldstein

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NCTN Lead Academic Participating Site at Dana-Farber/Partners Cancer CareU10CA180867 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI BURSTEIN, HAROLD JOHN, KIBEL, ADAM S · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180867NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast has rapidly increased in incidence over the past several decades secondary to an increased use of screening mammography. Local treatment options for women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ include mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy. Although several randomized trials have confirmed a >50% reduction in the risk of local recurrence with the administration of radiation therapy (RT) compared with breast-conserving surgery alone, controversy persists regarding whether or not RT is needed in selected "low-risk" patients. Over the past two decades, two prospective single-arm studies and one randomized trial have been performed and confirm that the omission of RT after surgery is associated with higher rates of local recurrence even after selecting patients with optimal clinical and pathologic features. Importantly, these trials have failed to consistently and reproducibly identify a low-risk cohort of patients (based on clinical and pathologic features) that does not benefit from RT. As a result, adjuvant RT is still advocated in the majority of patients, even in low-risk cases. Future research is moving beyond traditional clinical and pathologic risk factors and instead focusing on approaches such as multigene assays and biomarkers with the hopes of identifying truly low-risk patients who may not require RT. However, recent studies confirm that even low-risk patients identified from multigene assays have higher rates of local recurrence with local excision alone than would be expected with the addition of RT.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID25036472
PMCPMC4644064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.