ReviewCritical reviews in food science and nutrition2016
Food Fortification and Supplement Use-Are There Health Implications?
Review in Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Micronutrient's deficiency in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of nutritional science · 2021Pooled it
- Biological, dietetic and pharmacological properties of vitamin BNPJ science of food · 2025Review
- The Policy of Compulsory Large-Scale Food Fortification in Sub-Saharan Africa.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Indicators and Recommendations for Assessing Sustainable Healthy Diets.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Nutraceuticals' Novel Formulations: The Good, the Bad, the Unknown and Patents Involved.Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation · 2019Review
- Rationale and Plan for Vitamin D Food Fortification: A Review and Guidance Paper.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018Review
- The Prevalence of Micronutrient Deficiencies and Inadequacies in the Middle East and Approaches to Interventions.Nutrients · 2017Review
- Evidence Synthesis and Translation for Nutrition Interventions to Combat Micronutrient Deficiencies with Particular Focus on Food Fortification.Nutrients · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledDietary supplements are a multi-billion dollar industry in the U.S., and their use is increasing exponentially. Additionally, many foods and beverages are increasingly being fortified with single or multiple vitamins and minerals. Consequently, nutrient intakes are exceeding the safe limits established by the Institute of Medicine. In this paper, we examine the benefits and drawbacks of vitamin and mineral supplements and increasing consumption of fortified foods (in addition to dietary intake) in the U.S. POPULATION: The pros and cons are illustrated using population estimates of folic acid, calcium, and vitamin D intake, highlighting concerns related to overconsumption of nutrients that should be addressed by regulatory agencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.