Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25035532›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of pharmaceutical sciences2014

Measurement of adult antimicrobial drug use in tertiary care hospital using defined daily dose and days of therapy.

Dipika Bansal, S Mangla, K Undela, K Gudala, S D'Cruz, A Sachdev, P Tiwari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Antibiotic Utilization in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients - A Single Center Study.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2017
    Article
  11. Antimicrobial consumption in a tertiary children's hospital in Finland (2003-2013).European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dipika BansalDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali)-160 062, India.
S ManglaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali)-160 062, India.
K UndelaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, J.S.S. College of Pharmacy, J.S.S. University, S.S. Nagara, Mysore-570 015, India.
K GudalaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali)-160 062, India.
S D'CruzDepartment of General Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh-160 030, India.
A SachdevDepartment of General Medicine, Government Medical College and Hospital, Chandigarh-160 030, India.
P TiwariDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, S.A.S. Nagar (Mohali)-160 062, India.
National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · INGovernment Medical College and Hospital · INJSS Academy of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Widespread overuse and inappropriate use of antimicrobial drugs continues to fuel an increase in antimicrobial resistance and leads to consequent treatment complications and increased healthcare costs. In the present study we aimed to describe antimicrobial drug consumption and predictors and to identify potential targets for antimicrobial stewardship. This was a prospective observational study conducted at adult medicine wards of tertiary care teaching hospital over the period of five months. Antimicrobial drug consumption was measured using days of therapy per 1000 patient days and defined daily dose per 1000 patient days. Additionally, predictors of multiple antimicrobial prescribing were also analyzed. Seven hundred thirty patients were screened and 550 enrolled, receiving 1,512 courses of antimicrobial therapy, mainly intravenously (66%). Most frequently prescribed agents were artesunate (13%), ceftriaxone (11%) and metronidazole (10.5%). Overall consumption was 1,533 days of therapy per 1000 patient days and was mainly attributed to antibiotics (98.3%) for empirical therapy (50%). Median days of antimicrobial drugs prescribing were 3 (inter quartile range 2-5). Most commonly consumed antimicrobials were ceftriaxone (31%, 248.8 g) and artesunate (26%, 29 g). Antimicrobials contributed to 72.5% expense of the total incurred. Multivariate analysis reveals that younger patients (≥45 years) (odds ratio: 1.59, 95% CI 1.14-2.21) were more likely and absence of comorbidities (odds ratio: 0.58, 95% CI 0.42-0.79) and shorter hospital stay (≥6 days)(odds ratio: 0.44, 95% CI 0.32-0.60) were associated with less likelihood of prescribing multiple antimicrobial drugs. Estimating antimicrobial drugs use by defined daily dose method will remain open to criticism because the prescribed dosage is not often in agreement with the "usual" daily dose, which depends on location of and susceptibility of pathogenic organisms and metabolic status of the patient.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial drugsantimicrobial stewardshipdays of therapydefined daily dose

Identifiers

PMID25035532
PMCPMC4090828
OpenAlexW1499746919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.