Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25035454›Full record

ReviewThe Gerontologist2014

Disentangling the disabling process: insights from the precipitating events project.

Thomas M Gill

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Gerontologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas M GillDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. thomas.gill@yale.edu.
Yale University · US

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Denise Esserman · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Epidemiology of Disability and Recovery in Older PersonsR37AG017560 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2005 to 2014
$7.3M
Epidemiology of Bathing Disability in Elderly PersonsR01AG022993 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2004 to 2007
$1.6M
Research Training in Disability &Disabling DisordersK24AG021507 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2003 to 2012
$1.6M
ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP AWARD IN DISABILITY AND DISABLING DISORDERSK07AG043587 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2013 to 2017
$645k
PREVENTION OF FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY IN AT RISK ELDERSK23AG000759 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 1999 to 2002
$396k
NIA NIH HHS K07 AG043587NIA NIH HHS K07AG043587NIA NIH HHS K23AG00759NIA NIH HHS K24AG021507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342NIA NIH HHS P30AG21342NIA NIH HHS R01AG022993NIA NIH HHS R37 AG017560NIA NIH HHS R37AG17560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among older persons, disability in activities of daily living is common and highly morbid. The Precipitating Events Project (PEP Study), an ongoing longitudinal study of 754 initially nondisabled, community-living persons, aged 70 or older, was designed to further elucidate the epidemiology of disability, with the goal of informing the development of effective interventions to maintain and restore independent function. Over the past 16 years, participants have completed comprehensive, home-based assessments at 18-month intervals and have been interviewed monthly to reassess their functional status and ascertain intervening events, other health care utilization, and deaths. Findings from the PEP Study have demonstrated that the disabling process for many older persons is characterized by multiple and possibly interrelated disability episodes, even over relatively short periods of time, and that disability often results when an intervening event is superimposed upon a vulnerable host. Given the frequency of assessments, long duration of follow-up, and recent linkage to Medicare data, the PEP Study will continue to be an outstanding platform for disability research in older persons. In addition, as the number of decedents accrues, the PEP Study will increasingly become a valuable resource for investigating symptoms, function, and health care utilization at the end of life.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingDisability EvaluationProblem SolvingAgedFrail ElderlyHumansPersons with DisabilitiesCohort StudyDisabilityEpidemiologyJoseph T. Freeman Lecture

Identifiers

PMID25035454
PMCPMC4155452
OpenAlexW1980285822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.