Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25035283›Full record

ArticleClinical genitourinary cancer2014

Current practices in the management of adverse events associated with targeted therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a national survey of oncologists.

Janelle Nicole Ruiz, Viswanath Reddy Belum, Patricia Creel, Allen Cohn, Michael Ewer, Mario E Lacouture

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical genitourinary cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the COSMIC-021 Study.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacovigilance in oncology.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2018
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Sunitinib toxicity management - a practical approach.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Janelle Nicole RuizDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Viswanath Reddy BelumDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Patricia CreelDuke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Allen CohnRocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver, CO.
Michael EwerMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Mario E LacoutureDermatology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Electronic address: lacoutum@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDuke Medical Center · USRocky Mountain Cancer Centers · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Summer research experiences for medical students supervised by faculty mentorsR25CA020449 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Charlotte Eielson Ariyan · 1985 to 2026
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA020449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOncologists treating patients with targeted therapies encounter adverse events (AEs) that pose management challenges, lead to dosing inconsistencies, and impact patient quality of life. Oncologists' practices and attitudes in the management of targeted therapy-related AEs in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are poorly understood. We sought to identify unmet needs associated with AE management and understand oncologists' treatment optimization strategies.

methodsA 24-item online survey was administered in August 2012 to 119 US oncologists treating patients with advanced RCC. The survey solicited responses regarding demographics, practice settings, AE management practice patterns and beliefs, treatment barriers, and patient education.

resultsRespondents indicated that between 25% and 50% of patients require dose modification/discontinuation because of AEs. The greatest barrier to optimizing treatment for RCC is the unpredictability of patient responses to treatment (43%). Most respondents (78%) discuss AE management with patients, but only a minority of them proactively reach out to patients (46%). Most practitioners (70%) refer patients to nononcology specialists when faced with unfamiliar AEs, although finding interested physicians (43%) and time constraints (40%) were the most commonly cited barriers to consulting with other specialties.

conclusionResults suggest that many patients require dose modification/discontinuation because of AEs and that nononcologists are a frequently utilized resource to manage these events. There is a need for predictive drug toxicity markers to establish counseling and prevention, along with opportunities for increased education on supportive care techniques to maintain health-related quality of life and consistent dosing.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease ManagementDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansKidney NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationSurveys and QuestionnairesAntineoplastic AgentsAdvanced kidney cancerAnticancer therapyOncologist practice patternsSide effect management practicesTargeted therapy–related side effects

Identifiers

PMID25035283
PMCPMC4181324
OpenAlexW1968303828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.