Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25035065›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2015

Appendiceal adhesion to synthetic mesh after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a case report.

Roberto Vargas, Anna Keryan, Vatche A Minassian

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 87% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Roberto VargasDepartment of Urogynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 500 Brookline Ave 500B-Suite E, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Anna Keryan
Vatche A Minassian
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive alternatives to abdominal sacrocolpopexy have been shown to be equivalent with low overall complication rates. A small number of direct mesh-related gastrointestinal complications have been reported in the literature. Sacrocolpopexy with mesh retroperitonealization is recommended to minimize bowel adhesions. A 53-year-old nulligravid woman presented with persistent right lower-quadrant pain 1 year after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. The polypropylene mesh used during the case was retroperitonealized. Computed tomography (CT) prior to surgical exploration revealed no obvious pathology. On diagnostic laparoscopy, appendiceal adhesion to mesh requiring an appendectomy was observed. The patient's symptoms resolved after surgical intervention. Appendiceal adhesion to surgical mesh leading to chronic discomfort is a potential complication of intraperitoneal synthetic mesh placement. Our case emphasizes that bowel adhesions may occur even after proper mesh retroperitonealization. Appendiceal adhesion to the surgical site is a potential complication of retroperitonealized synthetic mesh placement at the time of sacrocolpopexy.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAppendectomyCecal DiseasesFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedTissue Adhesions

Identifiers

PMID25035065
OpenAlexW2067602504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.