Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25035048›Full record

Observational studyJournal of critical care2014

Central venous pressure after coronary artery bypass surgery: does it predict postoperative mortality or renal failure?

Judson B Williams, Eric D Peterson, Daniel Wojdyla, Ralf Harskamp, Kevin W Southerland, T Bruce Ferguson, Peter K Smith, Carmelo A Milano, Renato D Lopes

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of critical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Remote Measurement of Volume Status in Heart Failure.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judson B WilliamsDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Eric D PetersonDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel WojdylaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Ralf HarskampDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Kevin W SoutherlandDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
T Bruce FergusonDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences, Brody School of Medicine and East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Peter K SmithDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Carmelo A MilanoDivision of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Renato D LopesDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA. Electronic address: renato.lopes@duke.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USClinical Research Institute · USEast Carolina University · US

Funding

Cardiothoracic Surgical Network Clinical CenterU01HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2007 to 2013
$2.6M
Core Clinical Centers for the CTSNUM1HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL088953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough hemodynamic monitoring is often performed after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), the role of monitoring postoperative central venous pressure (CVP) measurement as a predictor of clinical outcomes is unknown. As such, this study tests the hypothesis that postoperative CVP is predictive of operative mortality or renal failure.

methodsThis is an observational cohort study of detailed clinical data from 2390 randomly selected patients undergoing high-risk CABG or CABG/valve at 55 hospitals participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons' National Cardiac Surgery Database 2004-2005. Eligible patients underwent elective/urgent CABG with an ejection fraction less than 40% or elective/urgent CABG at 65 years or older with diabetes or a glomerular filtration rate less than 60 mL/min per 1.73 m2. The exposure of interest is CVP monitoring in the intensive care unit after adult cardiac surgery. The primary outcome measure was correlation between postoperative CVP and inhospital/30-day mortality and renal failure, assessed as a continuous variable, both unadjusted and after adjusting for important clinical factors using logistic regression modeling.

resultsMean age was 72 years, 54% of patients had diabetes mellitus, 49% were urgent procedures, and mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 105 minutes. Patients' CVP 6 hours postoperation was strongly associated with inhospital and 30-day mortality: odds ratio (OR) of 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.87) for every 5-mm Hg increase in CVP; P<.0001. This association remained significant after risk adjustment: adjusted OR of 1.44 (95% CI, 1.10-1.89); P<.01. A model adjusting for cardiac index also revealed increased incidence of mortality or renal failure: adjusted OR of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.28-1.86) for every 5-mm Hg increase in CVP; P<.0001.

conclusionsPatients' CVP at 6 hours after CABG surgery was highly predictive of operative mortality or renal failure, independent of cardiac index and other important clinical variables. Future studies will need to assess whether interventions guided by postoperative CVP can improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedBlood Pressure DeterminationCentral Venous PressureCohort StudiesCoronary Artery BypassDiabetes MellitusFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHospital MortalityHumansLogistic ModelsMaleOdds RatioPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodRenal InsufficiencyCardiac indexCentral venous pressureCoronary artery bypassHemodynamic monitoringPerioperative careSurgery

Identifiers

PMID25035048
PMCPMC4315310
OpenAlexW2149789007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.