ArticleBMC health services research2014
Characteristics affecting oral anticoagulant therapy choice among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of new medicines into clinical practice: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Patient-specific and healthcare real-world costs of atrial fibrillation in individuals treated with direct oral anticoagulant agents or warfarin.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Shifting from vitamin K antagonists to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: predictors, patterns and temporal trends.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
- Patient Perspectives on Factors Affecting Direct Oral Anticoagulant Use for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Article
- Underuse of anticoagulant therapy in hospitalized older patients: comment on the article of Wojszel et al.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
- Sociodemographic factors and choice of oral anticoagulant in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Sweden: a population-based cross-sectional study using data from national registers.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Article
- Trends and Variation in Oral Anticoagulant Choice in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation, 2010-2017.Pharmacotherapy · 2018Article
- Knowledge is power: general practitioners prescribing of new oral anticoagulants in Ireland.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Effectiveness and Safety of Different Rivaroxaban Dosage Regimens in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Comparison of claims vs patient-reported adherence measures and associated outcomes among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation using oral anticoagulant therapy.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Predictors of new oral anticoagulant drug initiation as opposed to warfarin in elderly adults: a retrospective observational study in Southern Italy.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2018Article
- Major Bleeding Complications and Persistence With Oral Anticoagulation in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Contemporary Findings in Real-Life Danish Patients.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulation usage according to age among patients with atrial fibrillation: Temporal trends 2011-2015 in Denmark.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Evaluating the Initiation of Novel Oral Anticoagulants in Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2016Article
- Decision-making about the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulant therapies for patients with atrial fibrillation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2016Review
- The Influence of Socioeconomic Status on Selection of Anticoagulation for Atrial Fibrillation.PloS one · 2016Article
- Anticoagulant Utilization and Direct Oral Anticoagulant Prescribing in Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDabigatran is one of the three newer oral anticoagulants (OACs) recently approved in the United States for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients. The objective of this study was to identify patient, healthcare provider, and health plan factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use among NVAF patients.
methodsAdministrative claims data from patients with ≥ 2 NVAF medical claims in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database between 10/1/2009 and 10/31/2011 were analyzed. During the study intake period (10/1/2010 - 10/31/2011), dabigatran patients had ≥ 2 dabigatran prescriptions, warfarin patients had ≥ 2 warfarin and no dabigatran prescriptions, and the first oral anticoagulant (OAC) prescription date was the index date. Continuous enrollment for 12 months preceding ("pre-index") and ≥ 6 months following the index date was required. Patients without pre-index warfarin use were assigned to the 'OAC-naïve' subgroup. Separate analyses were performed for 'all-patient' and 'OAC-naïve' cohorts. Multivariable logistic regression (LR) identified factors associated with dabigatran versus warfarin use.
resultsOf 20,320 patients (3,019 dabigatran and 17,301 warfarin) who met study criteria, 27% of dabigatran and 13% of warfarin patients were OAC-naïve. Among all-patients, dabigatran patients were younger (mean 67 versus 73 years, p < 0.001), predominantly male (71% versus 61%, p < 0.001), and more frequently had a cardiologist prescriber (51% versus 30%, p < 0.001) than warfarin patients. Warfarin patients had higher pre-index Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (mean: 4.3 versus 4.0, p < 0.001) and higher ATRIA bleeding risk score (mean: 3.0 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). LR results were generally consistent between all- and OAC-naïve patients. Among OAC-naïve patients, strongest factors associated with dabigatran use were prescriber specialty (OR = 3.59, 95% CI 2.68-4.81 for cardiologist; OR = 2.22, 95% CI 1.65-2.97 for other specialist), health plan type (OR = 1.47 95% CI 1.10-1.96 for preferred provider organization), and prior ischemic stroke (OR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.06-1.90). Older age decreased the probability of dabigatran use.
conclusionsBeside patient characteristics, cardiology specialty of the prescribing physician and health plan type were the strongest factors associated with dabigatran use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.