ArticleSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2014
[Pediatric general practitioners and tertiary care structures for pain therapy. A qualitative study on the need for networking].
Article in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Chronic pain in pediatric primary care : What do adolescents and parents expect and how do they perceive treatment?]Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2022Article
- [Chronic primary pain disorders in children and adolescents].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the urgency of the problem of chronic pediatric pain and the importance of early interventions, many children experience intermittent episodes of pain over a long period of time. One aim of this study was to investigate the need of structured diagnostic tools and therapies of chronic pediatric pain in pediatric general practices. Another aim was to describe the aims, services and challenges of a network between pediatric practices and a tertiary pediatric pain centre, from the perspective of general pediatric practitioners. MATERIAL AND
methodsA qualitative research design was selected and 20 general pediatric practitioners were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Interviews were analyzed by use of qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.
resultsGenerally, the idea of a network between pediatric practices and the German Pediatric Pain Centre was rated positively by pediatric general practitioners. From the results of the analysis three categories were identified: (i) expectations from the network (ii) desire for cooperation in the network and (iii) recommendations for improved patient care.
conclusionA network with a centre for tertiary care was preferred by the general pediatric practitioners. To optimize the care of children with chronic pain further education for general pediatric practitioners as well as structured diagnostic tools and therapies of frequent pediatric chronic pain diseases are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.