SynthesisThe patient2014
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.
Synthesis in The patient, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07110779 (Telenursing in Coronary Artery Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 464 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Telenursing in Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Clinical Trial and Patient Collaboration
Who cites it
464 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Perceptions of robot-assisted arthroplasty among patients and the public : a scoping review.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in Otolaryngology research: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Facilitators of and barriers to patient and public involvement in mental health research within university settings: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.Psychological medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Deaf children's experiences of hearing in everyday life: a systematic review.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2025Pooled it
- Global Trends in the Relationship Between Chronic Air Pollution Exposure, Physical Activity and Lung Function in Youth Aged 5-18 Years With and Without Asthma: A Systematic Review.Sports medicine - open · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating Process and Outcomes of Public Involvement in Applied Health and Social Care Research: A Rapid Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- Core outcome sets for spinal and associated limb, trunk, abdomen or pelvic pain: A systematic review.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Meaningful consumer involvement in cancer care: a systematic review on co-design methods and processes.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic Review: Patient and Public Involvement of Children and Young People in Mental Health Research.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2024Pooled it
- Co-designing care for multimorbidity: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2024Pooled it
- The effects of co-designed physical activity interventions in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- "It gives me confidence and value": evaluating All_Ears@UoS patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) group three years on.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Co-Designing Wellbeing Initiatives With Rural Adolescents: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Do Androids Dream of Lived Experience? Navigating Risks, Uncertainty, and Best Practices Around Generative AI in Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Challenges and possibilities of public and patient involvement for early-career researchers: pedagogy, practice and data governance.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Empowering communities, educating researchers: reflections on researcher training through the 'Be the Voice of Your Community' Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) event.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Parent Partnership in Neonatal Research: Facilitators, Barriers and Contributions of the Irish PADDINGToN Parent Advisory Group.Child: care, health and development · 2026Article
404 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePatient and public involvement (PPI) in research has expanded nationally and internationally over the last decade, and recently there has been significant attention given to understanding its impact on research. Less attention has been given to the impact of PPI on the people involved, yet it has been shown that the success of PPI in research can be reliant on the processes of engagement between these individuals and communities. This paper therefore critically explores the impact of PPI on service users, researchers and communities involved in health and social care research. DATA SOURCES: Searches were undertaken from 1995 to April 2012 in the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane library, CINAHL, HMIC and HELMIS. Searches were undertaken for grey literature using the databases InvoNet and NHS Evidence. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they included the impact of PPI on individual service users, researchers or communities under research. Studies were excluded if they were in a foreign language (unless they were deemed critical to the systematic review) or were in children and adolescent services. STUDY APPRAISAL: Data were extracted using a narrative synthesis, and quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. MAIN
resultsService users reported feeling empowered and valued, gaining confidence and life skills. Researchers developed a greater understanding and insight into their research area, gaining respect and a good rapport with the community. The community involved in research became more aware and knowledgeable about their condition. However, lack of preparation and training led some service users to feel unable to contribute to the research, while other service users and communities reported feeling overburdened with the work involved. Researchers reported difficulties in incorporating PPI in meaningful ways due to lack of money and time.
conclusionThis is the first international systematic review to focus on the impact of PPI on the people involved in the process. The beneficial and challenging impacts reported highlight the importance of optimising the context and processes of involvement, so creating the potential for PPI to impact positively on the research itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25034612What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.