ArticleDer Unfallchirurg2016
[Rehabilitation of multiple injured patients in Germany: Clinic locations, structural and equipment attributes].
Article in Der Unfallchirurg, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A phase model of trauma rehabilitation : How can we avoid the "rehab-hole"?]Der Unfallchirurg · 2017Article
- [Comprehensive certification in the TraumaNetwork DGU. Milestones achieved and new challenges].Der Unfallchirurg · 2016Article
- [Inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation in Germany. Current state and further development].Der Unfallchirurg · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, there has been an ongoing improvement in the treatment and structural aspects of acute trauma care. Because of the definition of rehabilitation as a post-acute part of the treatment of traumatic injuries, especially in multiple injured patients, there is need to improve the interaction and cooperation between acute care hospitals and rehabilitation clinics. This article gives a survey of the current state of rehabilitation in Germany. MATERIALS AND
methodsBased on a directory of rehabilitation clinics and an internet search, all rehabilitation clinics were identified and included in the analysis for clinic location, structural and equipment attributes.
resultsIn total 551 rehabilitation clinics with expertise in the treatment of traumatic and orthopedic injuries were identified. In detail, broad differences between the federal states could be observed. The number of rehabilitation clinics per state ranged from 1 to 136 and the number of beds from 70 to 18040. The average catchment area covered by a rehabilitation clinic is 648 km(2) (range 149-2106 km(2)) with an average of 1584 patients per clinic per year. Of the clinics 68% can treat patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and 62.1% are able to deal with patients who need renal dialyses. Almost all clinics provide an x-ray facility (96.4%) while computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are available in 52.6% and 50.3%, respectively.
conclusionThe number of rehabilitation clinics available seems to be adequate for all patients with traumatic injuries but there are enormous differences between the federal states. Because rehabilitation is important for the outcome of multiple injured patients, a further improvement of the quality and integration into the regional trauma network seem to be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25034277What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.