Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25034267›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2014

Diagnostic performance of urinary metanephrines for the postmortem diagnosis of hypothermia.

Cristian Palmiere, Grzegorz Teresiński, Petr Hejna, Patrice Mangin, Eric Grouzmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A case of suicide by self-injection of adrenaline.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cristian PalmiereUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland, cristian.palmiere@chuv.ch.
Grzegorz Teresiński
Petr Hejna
Patrice Mangin
Eric Grouzmann
University Hospital of Lausanne · CHMedical University of Lublin · PLUniversity Centre of Legal Medicine · CHUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic potential of urinary metanephrines and 3-methoxytyramine compared to urinary catecholamine determination in diagnosing antemortem cold exposure and fatal hypothermia. 83 cases of fatal hypothermia and 144 control cases were included in this study. Catecholamines (adrenaline, noradrenaline and dopamine), metanephrines (metanephrine, normetanephrine) and 3-methoxytyramine were measured in urine collected during autopsy. All tested analytes were significantly higher in hypothermia cases compared to control subjects and displayed a generally satisfying discriminative value, thus indicating urinary catecholamines and their metabolites as reliable markers of cold-related stress and hypothermia related-deaths. Metanephrine and adrenaline had the best discriminative value between hypothermia and control cases compared to other tested analytes, though with different sensitivity and specificity. These can therefore be considered the most suitable markers of cold-related stress.

Indexed as

Cold-Shock ResponseAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAutopsyBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCause of DeathDopamineEpinephrineFemaleHumansHypothermiaMaleMetanephrine3-methoxytyramineBiomarkersDopamineEpinephrineMetanephrine

Identifiers

PMID25034267
OpenAlexW2074625660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.