ArticleExperimental brain research2014
Stroke-induced synergistic phase shifting and its possible implications for recovery mechanisms.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Motor Control System for Adaptation of Healthy Individuals and Recovery of Poststroke Patients: A Case Study on Muscle Synergies.Neural plasticity · 2019Article
- A physiologically based hypothesis for learning proprioception and in approximating inverse kinematics.Physiological reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Among other diminished motor capabilities, survivors of a stroke often exhibit pathological joint synergies. With respect to the upper limbs, these deficits diminish coordination in reaching, pointing, and daily task performance. Past research on pathological synergies suggests that the synergistic relationship between joints is different for flexion than in extension. One explanation for different flexion and extension synergies is that there exists a time difference between the joint being volitionally moved and the joint that moves in synergy. The goal of this research was to measure these synergistic time differences. The experiment included 11 hemiparetic subjects who performed rhythmic elbow motions at five different frequencies. A motion capture system was used to record the resulting shoulder synergies. Synergistic shoulder rotations were found to exhibit frequency-dependent phase lags (delays) and leads (advances) in the paretic arm. Furthermore, the synergistic leads and lags varied with frequency and were subject specific. We found that timing differences between joints in pathological movements are comparable to differences that were observed by other researchers for normal, able-bodied movement synergies. Moreover, the fact that pathological synergies were evident in rhythmic motion suggests that they are spinal in origin. A significant amount research exists relating to able-bodied spinal synergies. Thus, the supposition that pathological synergies are an expression of normal synergies would tie disabled movement into a larger body of work related to able-bodied synergies. The rehabilitation implications of this possible connection are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.