SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2014
Relationship between bladder cancer and total fluid intake: a meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association Between Alcohol Consumption and Risk of Bladder Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Modifiable risk factors for the prevention of bladder cancer: a systematic review of meta-analyses.European journal of epidemiology · 2016Pooled it
- Citrus Fruit Intake Substantially Reduces the Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies.Medicine · 2015Pooled it
- Coffee consumption and bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- The Association between Tea Consumption and Bladder Cancer Risk Based on the Bladder Cancer Epidemiology and Nutritional Determinants (BLEND) International Consortium.Nutrition and cancer · 2025Article
- Low daily water intake profile-is it a contributor to disease?Nutrition and health · 2024Review
- [Correlation between daily fluid intake behavioral habits and pathological characteristics of upper tract urothelial carcinoma].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2022Article
- Epidemiology beyond its limits.Science advances · 2022Article
- Genesis and Mechanism of Some Cancer Types and an Overview on the Role of Diet and Nutrition in Cancer Prevention.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Angioprevention of Urologic Cancers by Plant-Derived Foods.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Exploring the casual association between coffee intake and bladder cancer risk using Mendelian Randomization.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Green tea and cancer and cardiometabolic diseases: a review of the current epidemiological evidence.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2021Review
- Colon Bioaccessibility under In Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion of Different Coffee Brews Chemically Profiled through UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Investigation of the Association between Drinking Water Habits and the Occurrence of Women Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Lifestyle and Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Recurrence, Progression, and Mortality: Available Research and Future Directions.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- Lifestyle and nutritional modifiable factors in the prevention and treatment of bladder cancer.Urologic oncology · 2019Review
- Anticancer Effects of Green Tea and the Underlying Molecular Mechanisms in Bladder Cancer.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Total fluid consumption and risk of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis with updated data.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Fluid intake-to-bed time, nocturia frequency and the risk of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: a case-control study.Journal of Cancer · 2017Article
- Coffee Consumption and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEpidemiological findings regarding the association between total fluid intake and bladder cancer risk have yielded varying results. Our objective is to examine the possible associations between total fluid intake and bladder cancer risk.
methodsDatabases searched include the EMBASE and PUBMED, from inception to February 2014, with no limits on study language. We also reviewed the reference lists of identified studies. Stratified analyses were performed. A random-effect model was used to summarize the estimates of odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsOverall,17 case-control and four cohort studies were included. The overall OR of bladder cancer for the highest versus the lowest fluid intake was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.88-1.27). In the subgroup analyses, the overall ORs for coffee, green, and black tea intake were 1.17 (95% CI: 1.03-1.33), 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.95), and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.65-0.97), respectively. A significantly decreased risk was observed in Asian people (OR 0.27; 95% CI: 0.10-0.72). Among smokers, a suggestive inverse association was observed between total fluid intake and overall bladder cancer risk (OR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.62-1.02).
conclusionsAlthough this meta-analysis suggested that greater consumption of fluid may have a protective effect on bladder cancer in Asian people, there was no convincing evidence on this association because of the limitations of the individual trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.