Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25033833›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2014

Influence of secreted frizzled receptor protein 1 (SFRP1) on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple negative breast cancer does not rely on WNT signaling.

Christof Bernemann, Carolin Hülsewig, Christian Ruckert, Sarah Schäfer, Lena Blümel, Georg Hempel, Martin Götte, Burkhard Greve, Peter J Barth, Ludwig Kiesel and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christof BernemannTranslational Tumor Biology Group, Albert-Schweitzer Campus 1 A1, 48149, Münster, Germany. Christof.Bernemann@ukmuenster.de.
Carolin Hülsewig
Christian Ruckert
Sarah Schäfer
Lena Blümel
Georg Hempel
Martin Götte
Burkhard Greve
Peter J Barth
Ludwig Kiesel
Cornelia Liedtke
University Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Münster · DEMarien Hospital Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

Role of Id1 in NSCLC Progression and MetastasisR01CA139612 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI CHELLAPPAN, SRIKUMAR P. · 2009 to 2013
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS CA139612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTriple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by lack of expression of both estrogen and progesterone receptor as well as lack of overexpression or amplification of HER2. Despite an increased probability of response to chemotherapy, many patients resistant to current chemotherapy regimens suffer from a worse prognosis compared to other breast cancer subtypes. However, molecular determinants of response to chemotherapy specific to TNBC remain largely unknown. Thus, there is a high demand for biomarkers potentially stratifying triple negative breast cancer patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapies or alternative therapies.

methodsIn order to identify genes correlating with both the triple negative breast cancer subtype as well as response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy we employed publicly available gene expression profiles of patients, which had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Analysis of tissue microarrays as well as breast cancer cell lines revealed correlation to the triple negative breast cancer subtype. Subsequently, effects of siRNA-mediated knockdown on response to standard chemotherapeutic agents as well as radiation therapy were analyzed. Additionally, we evaluated the molecular mechanisms by which SFRP1 alters the carcinogenic properties of breast cancer cells.

resultsSFRP1 was identified as being significantly overexpressed in TNBC compared to other breast cancer subtypes. Additionally, SFRP1 expression is significantly correlated with an increased probability of positive response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Knockdown of SFRP1 in triple negative breast cancer cells renders the cells more resistant to standard chemotherapy. Moreover, tumorigenic properties of the cells are modified by knockdown, as shown by both migration or invasion capacity as well reduced apoptotic events. Surprisingly, we found that these effects do not rely on Wnt signaling. Furthermore, we show that pro-apoptotic as well as migratory pathways are differentially regulated after SFRP1 knockdown.

conclusionWe could firstly show that SFRP1 strongly correlates with the triple negative breast cancer subtype and secondly, that SFRP1 might be used as a marker stratifying patients to positively respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The mechanisms by which tumor suppressor SFRP1 influences carcinogenic properties of cancer cells do not rely on Wnt signaling, thereby demonstrating the complexity of tumor associated signaling pathways.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCell Line, TumorHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsNeoadjuvant TherapySecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSignal TransductionTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsWnt Signaling PathwayAntineoplastic AgentsIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMembrane ProteinsSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSFRP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25033833
PMCPMC4110378
OpenAlexW2121419223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.