ArticleScientific reports2014
Detecting communities based on network topology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Diversity, Predictive Protein Structures, and Interaction Networks of Cysteine-Rich Receptor-Like Kinases inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Frequency-specific segregation and integration of human cerebral cortex: An intrinsic functional atlas.iScience · 2024Article
- Article
- Alignment-free inference of hierarchical and reticulate phylogenomic relationships.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Article
- Hierarchical closeness-based properties reveal cancer survivability and biomarker genes in molecular signaling networks.PloS one · 2018Article
- A community detection algorithm using network topologies and rule-based hierarchical arc-merging strategies.PloS one · 2017Article
- Multi-resolution community detection in massive networks.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Uncovering disease mechanisms through network biology in the era of Next Generation Sequencing.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Finding Communities by Their Centers.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Discovering communities in complex networks by edge label propagation.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Friendship Concept and Community Network Structure among Elementary School and University Students.PloS one · 2016Article
- Metagenome Analysis Exploiting High-Throughput Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) Data.Trends in genetics : TIG · 2015Review
- Integrative analysis of human protein, function and disease networks.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Multi-frequency complex network from time series for uncovering oil-water flow structure.Scientific reports · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Network methods have had profound influence in many domains and disciplines in the past decade. Community structure is a very important property of complex networks, but the accurate definition of a community remains an open problem. Here we defined community based on three properties, and then propose a simple and novel framework to detect communities based on network topology. We analyzed 16 different types of networks, and compared our partitions with Infomap, LPA, Fastgreedy and Walktrap, which are popular algorithms for community detection. Most of the partitions generated using our approach compare favorably to those generated by these other algorithms. Furthermore, we define overlapping nodes that combine community structure with shortest paths. We also analyzed the E. Coli. transcriptional regulatory network in detail, and identified modules with strong functional coherence.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.