ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2014
Bivalent associations in Mus domesticus 2n = 40 spermatocytes. Are they random?
Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
- Simulating aggregates of bivalents in 2n = 40 mouse meiotic spermatocytes through inhomogeneous site percolation processes.Journal of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Hexavalents in spermatocytes of Robertsonian heterozygotes between Mus m. domesticus 2n=26 from the Vulcano and Lipari Islands (Aeolian Archipelago, Italy).European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The establishment of associations between bivalents from Mus domesticus 2n = 40 spermatocytes is a common phenomenon that shows up during the first prophase of meiotic nuclei. In each nucleus, a seemingly random display of variable size clusters of bivalents in association is observed. These associations originate a particular nuclear architecture and determine the probability of encounters between chromosome domains. Hence, the type of randomness in associations between bivalents has nontrivial consequences. We explore different models for randomness and the associated bivalent probability distributions and find that a simple model based on randomly coloring a subset of vertices of a 6-regular graph provides best agreement with microspreads observations. The notion of randomness is thereby explained in conjunction with the underlying local geometry of the nuclear envelope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.