Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25033456›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Synergy testing of FDA-approved drugs identifies potent drug combinations against Trypanosoma cruzi.

Joseph D Planer, Matthew A Hulverson, Jennifer A Arif, Ranae M Ranade, Robert Don, Frederick S Buckner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimization and biological validation of anBiology methods & protocols · 2021
    Article
  16. Review on Experimental Treatment Strategies AgainstJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph D PlanerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Matthew A HulversonDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Jennifer A ArifDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ranae M RanadeDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Robert DonDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative, Geneva, Switzerland.
Frederick S BucknerDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
University of Washington · USDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CH

Funding

Rational Development of Anti-Trypanosoma Cruzi DrugsR01AI070218 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BUCKNER, FREDERICK SIMMONS, GELB, MICHAEL H · 2006 to 2014
$4.4M
NIAID NIH HHS #AI070218NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI070218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An estimated 8 million persons, mainly in Latin America, are infected with Trypanosoma cruzi, the etiologic agent of Chagas disease. Existing antiparasitic drugs for Chagas disease have significant toxicities and suboptimal effectiveness, hence new therapeutic strategies need to be devised to address this neglected tropical disease. Due to the high research and development costs of bringing new chemical entities to the clinic, we and others have investigated the strategy of repurposing existing drugs for Chagas disease. Screens of FDA-approved drugs (described in this paper) have revealed a variety of chemical classes that have growth inhibitory activity against mammalian stage Trypanosoma cruzi parasites. Aside from azole antifungal drugs that have low or sub-nanomolar activity, most of the active compounds revealed in these screens have effective concentrations causing 50% inhibition (EC50's) in the low micromolar or high nanomolar range. For example, we have identified an antihistamine (clemastine, EC50 of 0.4 µM), a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (fluoxetine, EC50 of 4.4 µM), and an antifolate drug (pyrimethamine, EC50 of 3.8 µM) and others. When tested alone in the murine model of Trypanosoma cruzi infection, most compounds had insufficient efficacy to lower parasitemia thus we investigated using combinations of compounds for additive or synergistic activity. Twenty-four active compounds were screened in vitro in all possible combinations. Follow up isobologram studies showed at least 8 drug pairs to have synergistic activity on T. cruzi growth. The combination of the calcium channel blocker, amlodipine, plus the antifungal drug, posaconazole, was found to be more effective at lowering parasitemia in mice than either drug alone, as was the combination of clemastine and posaconazole. Using combinations of FDA-approved drugs is a promising strategy for developing new treatments for Chagas disease.

Indexed as

Drug CombinationsDrug SynergismAnimalsClemastineFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CTriazolesTrypanocidal AgentsTrypanosoma cruziClemastineDrug CombinationsposaconazoleTriazolesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID25033456
PMCPMC4102417
OpenAlexW2087632839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.