Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25033302›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2014

Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for patients with acute respiratory failure secondary to the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review.

Marianne Fitzgerald, Jonathan Millar, Bronagh Blackwood, Andrew Davies, Stephen J Brett, Daniel F McAuley, James J McNamee

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 37 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02654327 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

pRotective vEntilation With Veno-venouS Lung assisT in Respiratory Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorBelfast Health and Social Care TrustRan2016 to 2022Enrolled1,120ConditionsAcute Respiratory Failure With HypoxiaArmsVV-ECCO2R to enable lower tidal volume mechanical ventilation
NCT06938217 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Flow ECMO in a Multi-modal Cohort of Adults in Respiratory Failure

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Extracorporeal Life SupportRan2025 to 2027Enrolled30ConditionsAcute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure, Mechanical Ventilation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)ArmsLow-flow ECMO
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of extracorporeal COCritical care (London, England) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for critically ill adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Impact of Arterial CORespiratory care · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The future of acute and emergency care.Future healthcare journal · 2021
    Article
  19. The use of extracorporeal COAnnals of intensive care · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marianne Fitzgerald
Jonathan Millar
Bronagh Blackwood
Andrew Davies
Stephen J Brett
Daniel F McAuley
James J McNamee
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) continues to have significant mortality and morbidity. The only intervention proven to reduce mortality is the use of lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategies, although such a strategy may lead to problematic hypercapnia. Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO₂R) devices allow uncoupling of ventilation from oxygenation, thereby removing carbon dioxide and facilitating lower tidal volume ventilation. We performed a systematic review to assess efficacy, complication rates, and utility of ECCO₂R devices. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), case-control studies and case series with 10 or more patients. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS (Literatura Latino Americana em Ciências da Saúde), and ISI Web of Science, in addition to grey literature and clinical trials registries. Data were independently extracted by two reviewers against predefined criteria and agreement was reached by consensus. Outcomes of interest included mortality, intensive care and hospital lengths of stay, respiratory parameters and complications. The review included 14 studies with 495 patients (two RCTs and 12 observational studies). Arteriovenous ECCO₂R was used in seven studies, and venovenous ECCO₂R in seven studies. Available evidence suggests no mortality benefit to ECCO₂R, although post hoc analysis of data from the most recent RCT showed an improvement in ventilator-free days in more severe ARDS. Organ failure-free days or ICU stay have not been shown to decrease with ECCOvR. Carbon dioxide removal was widely demonstrated as feasible, facilitating the use of lower tidal volume ventilation. Complication rates varied greatly across the included studies, representing technological advances. There was a general paucity of high-quality data and significant variation in both practice and technology used among studies, which confounded analysis. ECCO₂R is a rapidly evolving technology and is an efficacious treatment to enable protective lung ventilation. Evidence for a positive effect on mortality and other important clinical outcomes is lacking. Rapid technological advances have led to major changes in these devices and together with variation in study design have limited applicability of analysis. Further well-designed adequately powered RCTs are needed.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal CirculationHumansHypercapniaRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID25033302
PMCPMC4056779
OpenAlexW1997675095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.