ArticlePloS one2014
Effective automated feature construction and selection for classification of biological sequences.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ensemble Machine Learning and Predicted Properties Promote Antimicrobial Peptide Identification.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2024Article
- FTDZOA: An Efficient and Robust FS Method with Multi-Strategy Assistance.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Ensemble learning-based approach for automatic classification of termite mushrooms.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- TransposonUltimate: software for transposon classification, annotation and detection.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- LMPred: predicting antimicrobial peptides using pre-trained language models and deep learning.Bioinformatics advances · 2022Article
- From rumor to genetic mutation detection with explanations: a GAN approach.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- DASSI: differential architecture search for splice identification from DNA sequences.BioData mining · 2021Article
- Splice2Deep: An ensemble of deep convolutional neural networks for improved splice site prediction in genomic DNA.Gene: X · 2020Article
- ACEP: improving antimicrobial peptides recognition through automatic feature fusion and amino acid embedding.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- funbarRF: DNA barcode-based fungal species prediction using multiclass Random Forest supervised learning model.BMC genetics · 2019Article
- Article
- Deep learning improves antimicrobial peptide recognition.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Are Randomized Controlled Trials the (G)old Standard? From Clinical Intelligence to Prescriptive Analytics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2016Article
- Computational approaches for predicting mutant protein stability.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016Review
- Article
- Identification of donor splice sites using support vector machine: a computational approach based on positional, compositional and dependency features.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2016Article
- Single nucleotide variations: biological impact and theoretical interpretation.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany open problems in bioinformatics involve elucidating underlying functional signals in biological sequences. DNA sequences, in particular, are characterized by rich architectures in which functional signals are increasingly found to combine local and distal interactions at the nucleotide level. Problems of interest include detection of regulatory regions, splice sites, exons, hypersensitive sites, and more. These problems naturally lend themselves to formulation as classification problems in machine learning. When classification is based on features extracted from the sequences under investigation, success is critically dependent on the chosen set of features. METHODOLOGY: We present an algorithmic framework (EFFECT) for automated detection of functional signals in biological sequences. We focus here on classification problems involving DNA sequences which state-of-the-art work in machine learning shows to be challenging and involve complex combinations of local and distal features. EFFECT uses a two-stage process to first construct a set of candidate sequence-based features and then select a most effective subset for the classification task at hand. Both stages make heavy use of evolutionary algorithms to efficiently guide the search towards informative features capable of discriminating between sequences that contain a particular functional signal and those that do not.
resultsTo demonstrate its generality, EFFECT is applied to three separate problems of importance in DNA research: the recognition of hypersensitive sites, splice sites, and ALU sites. Comparisons with state-of-the-art algorithms show that the framework is both general and powerful. In addition, a detailed analysis of the constructed features shows that they contain valuable biological information about DNA architecture, allowing biologists and other researchers to directly inspect the features and potentially use the insights obtained to assist wet-laboratory studies on retainment or modification of a specific signal. Code, documentation, and all data for the applications presented here are provided for the community at http://www.cs.gmu.edu/~ashehu/?q=OurTools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.