ArticlePLoS computational biology2014
Modeling bi-modality improves characterization of cell cycle on gene expression in single cells.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- CycleMix: Gaussian mixture modeling of the cell cycle.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Inferring causal trajectories from spatial transcriptomics using CASCAT.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Incorporating cell hierarchy to decipher the functional diversity of single cells.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- G1/S restriction point coordinates phasic gene expression and cell differentiation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Distinguishing activated T regulatory cell and T conventional cells by single-cell technologies.Immunology · 2022Article
- A COMPOSITIONAL MODEL TO ASSESS EXPRESSION CHANGES FROM SINGLE-CELL RNA-SEQ DATA.The annals of applied statistics · 2021Article
- Latent periodic process inference from single-cell RNA-seq data.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Deciphering the transcriptomic landscape of tumor-infiltrating CD8 lymphocytes in B16 melanoma tumors with single-cell RNA-Seq.Oncoimmunology · 2020Article
- Article
- Gene Expression-Based Identification of Antigen-Responsive CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2019Article
- GrandPrix: scaling up the Bayesian GPLVM for single-cell data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Antigen discovery and specification of immunodominance hierarchies for MHCII-restricted epitopes.Nature medicine · 2018Article
- Single-cell Quantitation of mRNA and Surface Protein Expression in Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-infected CD4+ T Cells Isolated from Rhesus macaques.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Single cell molecular alterations reveal target cells and pathways of concussive brain injury.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into restricted myeloid progenitors before cell division in mice.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Automated cell cycle and cell size measurements for single-cell gene expression studies.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Article
- Gene Regulatory Network Inference from Single-Cell Data Using Multivariate Information Measures.Cell systems · 2017Article
- Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Reveals Expanded Clones of Islet Antigen-Reactive CD4Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2017Article
- Reconstructing cell cycle pseudo time-series via single-cell transcriptome data.Nature communications · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in high-throughput, single cell gene expression are allowing interrogation of cell heterogeneity. However, there is concern that the cell cycle phase of a cell might bias characterizations of gene expression at the single-cell level. We assess the effect of cell cycle phase on gene expression in single cells by measuring 333 genes in 930 cells across three phases and three cell lines. We determine each cell's phase non-invasively without chemical arrest and use it as a covariate in tests of differential expression. We observe bi-modal gene expression, a previously-described phenomenon, wherein the expression of otherwise abundant genes is either strongly positive, or undetectable within individual cells. This bi-modality is likely both biologically and technically driven. Irrespective of its source, we show that it should be modeled to draw accurate inferences from single cell expression experiments. To this end, we propose a semi-continuous modeling framework based on the generalized linear model, and use it to characterize genes with consistent cell cycle effects across three cell lines. Our new computational framework improves the detection of previously characterized cell-cycle genes compared to approaches that do not account for the bi-modality of single-cell data. We use our semi-continuous modelling framework to estimate single cell gene co-expression networks. These networks suggest that in addition to having phase-dependent shifts in expression (when averaged over many cells), some, but not all, canonical cell cycle genes tend to be co-expressed in groups in single cells. We estimate the amount of single cell expression variability attributable to the cell cycle. We find that the cell cycle explains only 5%-17% of expression variability, suggesting that the cell cycle will not tend to be a large nuisance factor in analysis of the single cell transcriptome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.