Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25032992›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2014

Modeling bi-modality improves characterization of cell cycle on gene expression in single cells.

Andrew McDavid, Lucas Dennis, Patrick Danaher, Greg Finak, Michael Krouse, Alice Wang, Philippa Webster, Joseph Beechem, Raphael Gottardo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew McDavidDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Lucas DennisNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Patrick DanaherNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Greg FinakVaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Michael KrouseNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Alice WangBD Biosciences, San Jose, California, United States of America.
Philippa WebsterNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Joseph BeechemNanoString Technologies, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Raphael GottardoDepartment of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America; Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

The Statistical and Computational Analysis of Flow Cytometry DataR01EB008400 · NIBIB · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GOTTARDO, RAPHAEL · 2008 to 2015
$2.9M
Immune signatures of protection induced by whole parasite malaria vaccinesU19AI089986 · NIAID · SEATTLE BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STUART, KENNETH D · 2010 to 2015
$2.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089986NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in high-throughput, single cell gene expression are allowing interrogation of cell heterogeneity. However, there is concern that the cell cycle phase of a cell might bias characterizations of gene expression at the single-cell level. We assess the effect of cell cycle phase on gene expression in single cells by measuring 333 genes in 930 cells across three phases and three cell lines. We determine each cell's phase non-invasively without chemical arrest and use it as a covariate in tests of differential expression. We observe bi-modal gene expression, a previously-described phenomenon, wherein the expression of otherwise abundant genes is either strongly positive, or undetectable within individual cells. This bi-modality is likely both biologically and technically driven. Irrespective of its source, we show that it should be modeled to draw accurate inferences from single cell expression experiments. To this end, we propose a semi-continuous modeling framework based on the generalized linear model, and use it to characterize genes with consistent cell cycle effects across three cell lines. Our new computational framework improves the detection of previously characterized cell-cycle genes compared to approaches that do not account for the bi-modality of single-cell data. We use our semi-continuous modelling framework to estimate single cell gene co-expression networks. These networks suggest that in addition to having phase-dependent shifts in expression (when averaged over many cells), some, but not all, canonical cell cycle genes tend to be co-expressed in groups in single cells. We estimate the amount of single cell expression variability attributable to the cell cycle. We find that the cell cycle explains only 5%-17% of expression variability, suggesting that the cell cycle will not tend to be a large nuisance factor in analysis of the single cell transcriptome.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticCell CycleCell LineComputational BiologyGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGene Regulatory NetworksGenes, cdcHumans

Identifiers

PMID25032992
PMCPMC4102402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.