Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25032748›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2014

Extracorporeal life support devices and strategies for management of acute cardiorespiratory failure in adult patients: a comprehensive review.

Kiran Shekar, Daniel V Mullany, Bruce Thomson, Marc Ziegenfuss, David G Platts, John F Fraser

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03857217 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Post-Cardiotomy Extra-Corporeal Life Support Study: a Retrospective International Multicenter Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2019 to 2019Enrolled2,000ConditionsCardiogenic Shock, Resuscitation, Cardiac SurgeryArmsExtra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation
NCT05406492 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Population Pharmacokinetics of Antibiotics, Sedative and Analgesics, and Antiplatelet Agents During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorGachon University Gil Medical CenterRan2019 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsPharmacokinetics, Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationArmsResidual blood
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation of Cardiohelp and portable devices for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The role of extracorporeal COFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Kinetics of C-reactive protein during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.The International journal of artificial organs · 2024
    Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kiran Shekar
Daniel V Mullany
Bruce Thomson
Marc Ziegenfuss
David G Platts
John F Fraser
University of Queensland · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evolution of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) technology has added a new dimension to the intensive care management of acute cardiac and/or respiratory failure in adult patients who fail conventional treatment. ECLS also complements cardiac surgical and cardiology procedures, implantation of long-term mechanical cardiac assist devices, heart and lung transplantation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Available ECLS therapies provide a range of options to the multidisciplinary teams who are involved in the time-critical care of these complex patients. While venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide complete respiratory support, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal facilitates protective lung ventilation and provides only partial respiratory support. Mechanical circulatory support with venoarterial (VA) ECMO employed in a traditional central/peripheral fashion or in a temporary ventricular assist device configuration may stabilise patients with decompensated cardiac failure who have evidence of end-organ dysfunction, allowing time for recovery, decision-making, and bridging to implantation of a long-term mechanical circulatory support device and occasionally heart transplantation. In highly selected patients with combined severe cardiac and respiratory failure, advanced ECLS can be provided with central VA ECMO, peripheral VA ECMO with timely transition to venovenous ECMO or VA-venous ECMO upon myocardial recovery to avoid upper body hypoxia or by addition of an oxygenator to the temporary ventricular assist device circuit. This article summarises the available ECLS options and provides insights into the principles and practice of these techniques. One should emphasise that, as is common with many emerging therapies, their optimal use is currently not backed by quality evidence. This deficiency needs to be addressed to ensure that the full potential of ECLS can be achieved.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAcute DiseaseCritical CareExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHeart FailureHumansRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID25032748
PMCPMC4057103
OpenAlexW2125821634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.