Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25032244›Full record

ArticleTheScientificWorldJournal2014

Nonlinear quantitative radiation sensitivity prediction model based on NCI-60 cancer cell lines.

Chunying Zhang, Luc Girard, Amit Das, Sun Chen, Guangqiang Zheng, Kai Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in TheScientificWorldJournal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chunying ZhangSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Luc GirardHamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA ; Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Amit DasHamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.
Sun ChenSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Guangqiang ZhengSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Kai SongSchool of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China ; Hamon Center for Therapeutic Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA ; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9195-6160

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We proposed a nonlinear model to perform a novel quantitative radiation sensitivity prediction. We used the NCI-60 panel, which consists of nine different cancer types, as the platform to train our model. Important radiation therapy (RT) related genes were selected by significance analysis of microarrays (SAM). Orthogonal latent variables (LVs) were then extracted by the partial least squares (PLS) method as the new compressive input variables. Finally, support vector machine (SVM) regression model was trained with these LVs to predict the SF2 (the surviving fraction of cells after a radiation dose of 2 Gy γ-ray) values of the cell lines. Comparison with the published results showed significant improvement of the new method in various ways: (a) reducing the root mean square error (RMSE) of the radiation sensitivity prediction model from 0.20 to 0.011; and (b) improving prediction accuracy from 62% to 91%. To test the predictive performance of the gene signature, three different types of cancer patient datasets were used. Survival analysis across these different types of cancer patients strongly confirmed the clinical potential utility of the signature genes as a general prognosis platform. The gene regulatory network analysis identified six hub genes that are involved in canonical cancer pathways.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAdultAgedCell Line, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsRadiation Tolerance

Identifiers

PMID25032244
PMCPMC4083270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.