Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25032219›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Performance studies on distributed virtual screening.

Jens Krüger, Richard Grunzke, Sonja Herres-Pawlis, Alexander Hoffmann, Luis de la Garza, Oliver Kohlbacher, Wolfgang E Nagel, Sandra Gesing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Review
  2. 1001 Ways to run AutoDock Vina for virtual screening.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jens KrügerCenter for Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center, and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Richard GrunzkeTechnische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 12-14, 01069 Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1255-5498
Sonja Herres-PawlisLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr aße 5-13, 81377 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4354-4353
Alexander HoffmannLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Butenandtstr aße 5-13, 81377 München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-8839
Luis de la GarzaCenter for Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center, and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Oliver KohlbacherCenter for Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center, and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Sand 14, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Wolfgang E NagelTechnische Universität Dresden, Zellescher Weg 12-14, 01069 Dresden, Germany.
Sandra GesingCenter for Research Computing, University of Notre Dame, P.O. Box 539, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6051-0673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual high-throughput screening (vHTS) is an invaluable method in modern drug discovery. It permits screening large datasets or databases of chemical structures for those structures binding possibly to a drug target. Virtual screening is typically performed by docking code, which often runs sequentially. Processing of huge vHTS datasets can be parallelized by chunking the data because individual docking runs are independent of each other. The goal of this work is to find an optimal splitting maximizing the speedup while considering overhead and available cores on Distributed Computing Infrastructures (DCIs). We have conducted thorough performance studies accounting not only for the runtime of the docking itself, but also for structure preparation. Performance studies were conducted via the workflow-enabled science gateway MoSGrid (Molecular Simulation Grid). As input we used benchmark datasets for protein kinases. Our performance studies show that docking workflows can be made to scale almost linearly up to 500 concurrent processes distributed even over large DCIs, thus accelerating vHTS campaigns significantly.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinDrug DiscoveryMolecular Docking SimulationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Kinases

Identifiers

PMID25032219
PMCPMC4083208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.