Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25032098›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2014

Coronary microvasculopathy in heart transplantation: Consequences and therapeutic implications.

Alessandra Vecchiati, Sara Tellatin, Annalisa Angelini, Sabino Iliceto, Francesco Tona

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of transplantation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Risk factors of cardiac allograft vasculopathy.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2015
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alessandra VecchiatiAlessandra Vecchiati, Sara Tellatin, Annalisa Angelini, Sabino Iliceto, Francesco Tona, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Sara TellatinAlessandra Vecchiati, Sara Tellatin, Annalisa Angelini, Sabino Iliceto, Francesco Tona, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Annalisa AngeliniAlessandra Vecchiati, Sara Tellatin, Annalisa Angelini, Sabino Iliceto, Francesco Tona, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Sabino IlicetoAlessandra Vecchiati, Sara Tellatin, Annalisa Angelini, Sabino Iliceto, Francesco Tona, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
Francesco TonaAlessandra Vecchiati, Sara Tellatin, Annalisa Angelini, Sabino Iliceto, Francesco Tona, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, Padova University Hospital, 35128 Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the progress made in the prevention and treatment of rejection of the transplanted heart, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the main cause of death in late survival transplanted patients. CAV consists of a progressive diffuse intimal hyperplasia and the proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, ending in wall thickening of epicardial vessels, intramyocardial arteries (50-20 μm), arterioles (20-10 μm), and capillaries (< 10 μm). The etiology of CAV remains unclear; both immunologic and non-immunologic mechanisms contribute to endothelial damage with a sustained inflammatory response. The immunological factors involved are Human Leukocyte Antigen compatibility between donor and recipient, alloreactive T cells and the humoral immune system. The non-immunological factors are older donor age, ischemia-reperfusion time, hyperlipidemia and CMV infections. Diagnostic techniques that are able to assess microvascular function are lacking. Intravascular ultrasound and fractional flow reserve, when performed during coronary angiography, are able to detect epicardial coronary artery disease but are not sensitive enough to assess microvascular changes. Some authors have proposed an index of microcirculatory resistance during maximal hyperemia, which is calculated by dividing pressure by flow (distal pressure multiplied by the hyperemic mean transit time). Non-invasive methods to assess coronary physiology are stress echocardiography, coronary flow reserve by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography, single photon emission computed tomography, and perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance. In this review, we intend to analyze the mechanisms, consequences and therapeutic implications of microvascular dysfunction, including an extended citation of relevant literature data.

Indexed as

Cardiac allograft vasculopathyCoronary flow reserveEndothelial dysfunctionHeart transplantationMicrovascular function

Identifiers

PMID25032098
PMCPMC4094955
OpenAlexW1417202303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.