ReviewJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2013
Efficacy of palifermin in the hematopoietic stem cell transplant setting.
Review in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preclinical efficacy and safety evaluation of a topical mesenchymal stem cell derived conditioned media gel for oral mucositis management.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Long-Term Outcomes with and without Palifermin in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Palifermin is a recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor that stimulates proliferation and differentiation of epithelial cells. Palifermin's biological activity exerts cytoprotective and healing effects that decrease cell injury caused by chemotherapy and radiation therapy. In randomized, placebo-controlled trials, palifermin significantly reduced the incidence and duration of severe oral mucositis. Based on these findings, the US Food and Drug Administration approved palifermin for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing myeloablative therapy followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, researchers testing the efficacy of palifermin in postapproval studies using various conditioning regimens have debated the extrapolation of palifermin dosage and dosing frequency used in the registration study as inappropriate for less mucotoxic agents. In addition, modifying the dosing intervals and frequency of palifermin has been proposed to decrease adverse events and achieve the highest clinical benefits for less mucotoxic regimens. The incidence and severity of oral mucositis vary significantly across different conditioning regimens. Hence, cost-effectiveness and the clinical benefits of palifermin among various conditioning regimens have also been debated. This article reviews the published literature on the efficacy of palifermin and makes evidence-based recommendations for the use of palifermin in the HSCT setting.
Identifiers
25031987PMC4093413W2319936614What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.