Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25031632›Full record

ReviewAlzheimer's research & therapy2014

Interpreting Alzheimer's disease clinical trials in light of the effects on amyloid-β.

Jeremy H Toyn, Michael K Ahlijanian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. A framework for translating tauopathy therapeutics: Drug discovery to clinical trials.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmacological and Toxicological Properties of the Potent OralThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Centrally Delivered BACE1 Inhibitor Activates Microglia, and Reverses Amyloid Pathology and Cognitive Deficit in Aged Tg2576 Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  19. Microglial Aβ receptors in Alzheimer's disease.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jeremy H ToynBristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Neuroscience Biology, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492, USA.
Michael K AhlijanianBristol-Myers Squibb Research and Development, Neuroscience Biology, 5 Research Parkway, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The failure of several potential Alzheimer's disease therapeutics in mid- to late-stage clinical development has provoked significant discussion regarding the validity of the amyloid hypothesis. In this review, we propose a minimum criterion of 25% for amyloid-β (Aβ) lowering to achieve clinically meaningful slowing of disease progression. This criterion is based on genetic, risk factor, clinical and preclinical studies. We then compare this minimum criterion with the degree of Aβ lowering produced by the potential therapies that have failed in clinical trials. If the proposed minimum Aβ lowering criterion is used, then the amyloid hypothesis has yet to be adequately tested in the clinic. Therefore, we believe that the amyloid hypothesis remains valid and remains to be confirmed or refuted in future clinical trials.

Identifiers

PMID25031632
PMCPMC4014014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.